Goodbye CSS!

choww SG

Are the plates still there?

Acx1688 SG

Most of the plates are taken doen on Monday Afternoon, however, if you still wan 2 take pix, go to Marine Crescent pair of bustops[os n opp blk 34], still there Shocked I CONFIRMED as i juz saw it on my way back to my block Very Happy

Acx1688 SG

sv196 fleet boosted:

SBS2819T[sv15], SBS9408A may either b perm or peak X-over, need to monitor more.
There's a total of 5 sv196e if i din see wrongly for evening peak.
SBS9283S mayb be a down trip for sv10 for evening peak starting from Anson Rd/Keppel Rd.
sv14 and sv16 no change so far, not a lot of JB SP on sv16...

SBS9806J SG

SBS2819T m,ayve perm 196e

sbst275 SG

If I’m not wrong, CSS sv info somehow is still around

SBS2671B SG

For Sv 16, maybe SBS1709J or SBS1740S join the fleet

service_238 SG

go to the online timetables and find out how many 196e trips are there means how many 196e perm buses are there. Its either fleet addition of 1 bus or they convert that 1964M to 196e only.

So how, may i know, that 196 fleet got boosted?

I still remember your theory and logic about your "Strengthened sv196 fleet" and your "Suntec-Marine Parade 196 VS 36" when in actual fact nothing really much happens? Rolling Eyes

SBS9806J SG

Never see both since 608 got withdrawn leh

Acx1688 SG

If you wan 2 b cynical, go the bustop daily and check, if nt peace b w u!
SBS1964M is not sv196e coz i took the bus today, the extra sv196e so far i noticed are SBS2627E(2 days consecutive) and SBS2723K. My fren, i take sv196 evday now, if nothin happens, ev1 will be packed like sardines, btw do u take the buses from Suntec bac to the east side evday? if nt, keep your comments to yourself please. If u did notice the timetable for bustop opp Suntec twds Bedok, there's no bus between 1823hrs and 1900hrs rite, YOU ARE WRONG! coz SBS1964M comes in at 1842 hrs[subject to traffic conditions] DAILY.
And the timetable from os Maryland Park for sv196 is 632am and 658am, I TAKE THE 646am BUS EVERYDAY and reach Suntec around 659am! HW U EXPLAIN TT? Dun always believe waht is published, go do sme footwork so as not to make urself a laughing stock among sv196 commuters.

sbst275 SG

Sv 196 is probably the service that got service strengthened. E guide alrdy indicate 5 – 14 mins… PM off peak @ 12 mins

service_238 SG

1. ok fine 196/196e fleet gets 1 more SD from bndep because of extra 196e trip. And it happens to be not 1964M but some other SP bus (2627E likely).

2. you are seriously blind. The online timetables are for WAB trips not the full timetables like 10 15 18 29 32 33 34 35 37 40 42 45 52 57 58 59 68 79 85 86 91 93 94 97 103W 109 113 115 119 123 125 130 132 136 138 151 156 161 162 163 (not 163X) 166 175 181 182 185 186 191 193 194 200 246 251 333 354 400 401 402 408 409 410W (no 410G) 502 506 518. All SD trips and VO trips are not indicated. I believe what is published because the site stated clearly its for WAB trips. S196 does not have a full WAB fleet you know. And yes they screw up the WAB trips and the General Timetable by having identical timetables when its obvious that's not the full fleet.

Acx1688 SG

i m nt tryin 2 prove whos rite or wrong, juz 2 show that the bus timetable for WAB sv196 is not even correct. Smetimes for the schedule for e WAB bus in the morning, 632 and 658 is B9s and 646am is supposed to be normal[DD/SD] but 3 occasions tis week, Mon 7359X,Thurs 7403M, today 7342T r B9s and note on the evening peak bus twds Clementi 2 B9s come together. On saturdays, more B9s[from sv196 n oth svcs] are deployed on sv196 altogether.
SBS9408A mayb sv196 PERM

service_238 SG

B9s can cameo on non B9 slot. but Non-B9 cannot cameo on a B9 slot. except maybe under extreme conditions when there's seriously no SP B9 to deploy.

eg. Service 21 between the time after 7320G went bndep and before the Voith B9s came in.

Acx1688 SG

TT one i noe n i agree w u, but e main point is SBST timetable nt tt accurate…

striderz_o405 SG

* Scheduled timings are subject to traffic conditions. Please be at the bus stop 5 minutes earlier.

CS Pang SG

i totally agree with u.

« Previous Page