Their purchases of japanese buses are long ago so dont blame
them but I feel really they should replace the UDs . Well ,every
bus company have their own good and bad buses. Part and parcel of
life really. Look at the bright side, at least they have some
decent buses.
I feel that the UDs should be dump on less popular routes , I have
no complaints of UDs on 178 and 980. In fact 980 should use more
UDs until newer buses comes.
I hate some of the converted aircon buses like the Scania (SMRT) ,
horrible aircon if you sit near the rear. Sometimes I can see open
windows , i dont blame them really for opening the window .This is
something that SMRT should be looking at.
SMRT : Time for you to replace those lousy Nissan diesels.
SBST : Time for you to replace those lousy scanias (31L-80U) but
the CAC buses are not so bad.
Anyway back to the topic : Most pampered svc ? One svc comes into
my mind , svc 25. Why so many VSOS on that service ? I feel 3
should be more then enough , the rest should be given to svc 22,
166 and others. I dont know but I haven't see svc 24 and 53 with
Volvo buses for a long time . I saw svc 24 and 53 with Mark 4 DM
body bus , just once and that's it. Even the lousy scania bus
appeared on svc 53 once. According to a friend, he told me that
those svcs are from AMK depot and they have Volvo SD buses .
Question is why dont they deploy those Volvo Mark 4 buses as cameos
at least on 24 or 53 ? Not only those svcs , 139, 145, 135 ,have no
cameo volvo buses (correct me if I am wrong ) . What is wrong with
AMK depot ? Are they fcuk up or what? I am not happy with SBST and
the fact with so many lousy scanias on svc 33 which I take
everyday. Like or hate it, Suck thumb.
