busmanic SG i think that svc 274 is useless. its problem lies between it and svc 57. since svc 57 also go to Depot Rd why not change svc 274 into svc 57A plying between Bukit Merah and Depot Rd (loop)? it is like svc 163 & 371 (last time) now that 371 "change" to 163A.
ZYX2005 SG 57 in tiself is useless. it duplicates 100 from alexandra rd to shenton way to beach rd - no one takes it. a better bisahn to bt merah connection will be the go trhu farrer rd and lornie rd area. ZYX
NineGrains SG Your route also not direct enough. Useless too....duplicates SBST 165 from Upper Thomson to Farrer Road, and worse SMRT 855 from Upper Thomson to Bukit Merah. We need to follow recent trends....Express 57: Bishan--> Braddell--> --> --> Alexandra--> Depot Road --> Bukit Merah Interchange. <> denotes express sector
muziq bus SG 57? Useless....what about 58? barely surviving....passenger volume not even a double digit on off peak hours..
Apex-LW'21 SG The PTC Annual Report 2005 shows that 275 will be withdrawn, I don't think 274 will be withdrawn.
Apex-LW'21 SG Jurong Regional Library, Reference Section (Level 3) I'm very sure that 275 will be withdrawn. But, I'm not sure about any SWT on 131.
sbst275 SG Sv 57… Of all bet Sv 52, 57, 58 and 59, 57 has the slowest passenger ridership growth. Even Sv 59 is having standing passengers bet TAP and BDK RES during peak hrs
sinicker SG 57 is kinda bad ah. so bad they had to show the route as ads on the back/sides of the perm buses. 58/59 do have standing passengers during peak hrs. quite good. still, 58 during off-peak is bad.
sinicker SG u mean.. 48 has ads on its perm buses showing its route? or 48 has standing passengers during peak hrs?
sbst275 SG With regards to Sv 275’s immiment withdraw, I dun think a 131A is needed as 131 serves Bt Pumei in both direction
busmanic SG yah! svc 48 had those ads since i live at Selegie i had observe and had these results - ridership during...Peak Hours between 20-35 people Off-Peak Hours between 0-20 people
