[email protected] SG I hope this is not true, it’s like the Citybuzz … throwing $$$ down the drain. I think maybe to make it feasible, extend it to the nearby Paya Lebar Airport?
5454 SG Originally posted by busmanic: svc 114 plying between [b]HGBP and Hougang St. 21 does anyone know the route of this svc?[/b]Where did you get the info from.
sinicker SG 109 lah. 114 lah. just wait lah. no need crack ur brains and think so hard when the bus will come out, what buses they'll use.
busmanic SG got it from the PTC Annual Report 04/05 in the Jurong Regional Library. It also say the withdrawing of svc 275 - because of the extention of svc 131 to Bt Purmei
busmanic SG read the PTC Annual Report 03/04 say they rejected the SBST's proposed svc 109 and 110 cause they duplicate some other svc
busmanic SG cant wait for the PTC Annual report 05/06 BTW svc 114 was approved by PTC since June or July or September? 2004
Apex-LW'21 SG For Sv 109 & 110, it does not generate significant benefits to passengers, other than duplication. There are some other services to be amended like 62, 80, etc but were rejected due to PTC's reasons.
SBS9816E SG What I heard was Sv 115 is Sv 114…. some modifications done to Sv 114, and hence the existing Sv 115. What’s more, Sv 114 doesn’t sound auspicious to the elderly.
SBS9828X SG no lah... i dun think sbs now got superstitious... thats why dey intro 43, 48(maybe the 8 counter the death of 4)
bendy2003 SG haha you can expect the unexpected...... 323 was the exact replicate of 329 which was withdrawn due to poor ridership......but then again, that time no PTC :p
