Poll: Which svcs do you think should be amended/scrapped?

last SG · 2005-09-16T00:38:54+00:00

opps...sorry...i thought it is 284 and 285 Sorry bout tat... yea 274 and 275 should be withdrawn and according to some realiable source, which i 4got, the...

SBS2811P SG

Wah lao eh!Another topic again abt which svc do u tink should be amended or scrapped!I keep on seeing the same old reply leh!

I see your comments until I sianz 1/2 liao!U got no more fresh and funny ideas izzit,alwiz post the same old thing.If i BC on 12,and kerna extend to Clementi,I also very sianz 1/2.12 already 29 stages liao,u extend become 40 over stages.U want bus drivers to be exhausted izzit?U very bad leh!Yeah lor,u stay Clementi wat!So u want this svc for ur own selfish sake lor,so bad!Never think of the bus driver welfare.Then 23,wah lao,u itchy fingers wanna extend to New Bridge Rd for wat,got 147 liao.Good enuff.Then 56/97 merge,wah lao,kill the bus driver.56 n 97 serve different segments liao.Now also got 57,so also dun need 2 merge 56 n 97 leh.Well,I remember hor tat the lta dun wan bus companies to have long long long routes leh.So dun tink will extend 12 or merge 56 n 97 lor.

alex_cai92 SG

no need to amend 29 bcoz there are alot of svc which go straight ave 7...having staying at Tampiens all my life, i dun see a need to introduce a new Feeder/Townlink...

sinicker SG

yes, i too have stayed in tampines all my life. 17yrs 11mths nw. try taking 72 to blks700+ and 28/29/293 to blks 400+ during the evening peak hour. 72 would be barely half-full by the time it bypasses the blks 700+ there. 29 would be quarter-full after passing the dunman sec sch bus stop. try gg to tpjc side gate along ave 7 in the morning frn the int. and 293 is simply road-hogging along st 41/42/43 everyday.

alex_cai92 SG

but currently it is able to cope wif the demand....haf the BC ever rejected u and dun let u board? if yes, how often. I took 21 to school for the past 8 years. and during morning peak, 4get about boarding the 1st bus tat comes along...sumtimes the 2nd...

sinicker SG

i've not been rejected by the BC of coz' because i board frm the int. how abt those who take the bus at the library? tell them to go the int? think that is the only possible thing. moreover, there are no more free berths at Tamp Int.

yes, i do know abt 21 in the mornings. been there, done that.

sinicker SG

does anyone realise that 291 on the st 31 side and 293 on the st 45 side has buses wiv lotsa ‘T’s? the other side doesnt have any ‘T’ at all, and i see the buses start operating frm a break on the st 81 and st 71 side respectively. once i had to wait 30mins for a non ‘T’ 291. (saw the bus frm opp. library.. waited for that same bus to go st 31 and to the lib.. then, i took it) afterall, only ard 8 people on dat bus stayed for the trip on the other side. demand low, less non ‘T’s? or is this a matter on resetting fare-stages?

5454 SG

This will make a good route. Smile

SBS2811P SG

Extend 54 to Clementi 4 wat?54 is currently doing fine!54 was intro to make up for the loss of 104 n 134.If wanna extend Clementi,would have extended to Clementi long ago.Wun wait until now liao.I also said liao,SBS dun want their services to be long long one.Also got 156 frm Bishan 2 Clementi alreadi.Extend 54 for wat?From Chinatown to Clementi got the CT svc,then also got MRT,then also got 147.Waste resources!

SBS9828X SG

Maybe... or either u live on the stated area... I also see more Ts on this route...

If u see side destos, this areas are on the bottom few routes

SBS2688D SG

Sv 119 and Sv 115 can be merged together as one service How about that Rolling Eyes

Sv 107 plying Beach Rd(Keypoint, Golden Mile Complex) like former Sv 82 instead of Jln Sultan and Kallang Rd/Victoria St ???

28_29_293 SG

cos aft their break they drive towards st71/st83 for 291/293 respectively.

it's impossible to have 'T' towards st71/st83, cos if it has then there will be no bus to st33/st45 for 291/293. Agreed?

Unless aft their break they drive towards st33/st45.

alex_cai92 SG

it all depends on the timesheet...there are cases where they ply the other half of the route and continuing on...

28_29_293 SG

rarely they start a new trip towards st45/33? Rarely see b4

sinicker SG

can the VLS thingy fare-staging be set to start at 8.0?

Airbus330Captain SG

I think svc 81 should be extended to Sengkang from Serangoon interchange because of a lack of service to Sengkang unless you take the MRT.

Sengkang 81 Tampines

alex_cai92 SG

AFAIK, why not...

SBS2811P SG

How u wanna extend ah?If extend frm Serangoon Interchange onward ah?Extend ah,the route will be very loopy from Tampines to Sengkang.Serangoon oso got 156 to Sengkang lar!Like tat a bit extra leh?

SBS2811P SG

Wah lao!How come this thread got so many farnee and illogical suggestions?As if some of the current bus routes r not long enuff!As if some of the bus routes are not adequate enuff!

U another farnee one!Tink u so smart izzit?Dun anyhow suggest ah!105 peak hours can take up to approx 100 mins liao!Extend to Sengkang make the journey longer ah!105 already 34 stages like tat,extend to Sengkang become wat 44 to 46 stages ah!Then journey time more than 2 hours.Bus driver drive also butt pain and pek chek.Then ah,119 is macham like school bus service,a shorter version of 85 ah!Aiyah,wat I wanna say is tat the pax for 119 is very different from 105.Dun click one!119 and 105 cater 2 different grp of pax lar.Wake up ur idea lar!

Wah lao,tis thread is abt wat svc do u tink shld be amended,not do u tink should be merged.This also not fantasy buses.U want 105+119,wait 2 u have ur own bus company lar.

iveco SG

Since when did anyone say 105 could be merged with 119? All along the person was talking about 115.

SBS2811P SG

Ok!I admit I saw wrongly!I apologize!

« Previous Page Next Page »