sinicker SG NO WAY. B9TLs should run on normal trunk services. tsk. actually, we can use the VO2x and MK2 NAC for Citybuzz. so the tourists can admire the sights and sounds(no aircon mah, can hear wad is going on outside) of Spore. logical right my explanation? and hopefully 168 can have VSOs again. why did they put the LO3x on 168 ah? they want to overexert the buses on the expressways.. then can remove them out of service ah? as such, i conclude that Citybuzz is not profitable and revenues frm advertising and the normal trunk services are used to pay off the operations of the Citybuzz.
hseochin SG Wasting road space & contributing to traffic congestion as well ! Surely there must be other more resource & cost efficient ways to advertise ?!?? This service on the whole, i'll consider as a big flop ! A big joke to see typically only 1, 2 to 3 passengers needing to use such a big vehicle !
sbst275 SG Let them be... Because they are already lucky enough svs that are problematic yet new svs are allowed to be launched
^tamago^ SG agreed. LO3x have a distinct turbo lag but are very good at handling expressway sectors. furthermore, they are quieter on the higher speeds than the VSO's actually, if you don't count TVMobile (to which i'm deaf). also, in case i didn't clarify, i was saying when B9TL's come into trunk services, you probably won't think too much of or care about those B10TL's running around empty in the city. my prediction is also that B9TL's won't be used on Citybuzz.
28_29_293 SG i just pray veri hard tat citybuzz svc will b withdrawn unless sth is done(like using single deck buses). So chinatown direct svcs still alrite?
SBS1908B SG Use 1688K, 2888T, the CNG B10BLEs, and 9889U, 9888Y, so on! Better still if 997A, 998Y, 999U comes aboard. Quite impossible leh......hai.
Quite impossible leh......hai.
