Well...I do agree that some ppl might dislike the walk from that
bus stop to the MRT...it's about a 10 minutes walk from S'goon
Avenue 2...
Well...why can't ppl take 105 in the direction towards Serangoon
then and alight at Serangoon Interchanges and alight at Serangoon
Int and walk?
For your information...there's NO service 70 at Boundary Road or at
bus stop along Lorong Chuan at Cardiff Court. Get your facts right
before posting. It's service 53.
Well extending 315 to Serangoon Avenue 2 seems like a good
suggestion...well...after all it will bring the peeps from
Serangoon Avenue 2 to Serangoon Gdns...but then again...pax will
lose their link to x-fer to services along Boundary Rd...so it may
not be that feasible.
Well...y don't you feedback this to SBS Transit and see what they
can do about it...just state your feelings in general...as to how
to amend the service...well...leave it to them...dun act smart and
try to amend this and tat...see if they have anything in mind.
Hopefully if they intro a new svc from Serangoon. they might take
tis into consideration.
Originally posted by disappear:
The bus above doesnt exist.
Those who use this bus stop will know that even though it is not
far away from the MRT station, there is NO bus which can go there.
133 and 135 turn right at the Upp Sgoon Road junction, 105 go to
Yangzheng/Zhonghua Sch. If ONLY there is a bus which simply turns
LEFT, we will reach the Serangoon MRT immediately.
Even though it is possible to walk from this area to Serangoon MRT,
it is not near enough, so pple there may want to take bus to the
MRT.
Currently, if people dont walk to the Station, their alternative is
to go to the Cardiff Court or Boundary Rd Bus stop to wait for
22/70/853, or take 133 to Potong
Pasir MRT, which is very slow during morning heavy
traffic.however, the 22/70/853 option is for pple who live near
boundary road, what about
those who live along B02/01 Serangoon Ave 2?? [b]why go to Potong
Pasir Station when Serangoon MRT is just one stop
away?
If Woodleigh station is open, this will not be an issue, because at
least it is nearer, and at least there is still 135 which can go
there. but it is impossible that it will open anytime soon. and 133
is overload during peak.
So, i is wondering whether there can be a some sort of feeder
service(at least during peak hr) that can be introduced to go the
following route:
Serangoon Interchange==>Sgoon Ctrl===>Boundary
Road===>Serangoon Ave 2===>Upp Serangoon Road(Serangoon
MRT)===>(Sgoon Ctrl)===>Serangoon Int.
Plus another making the loop in the opposite direction, the former
during morning peak, latter during evening, if both directions are
not feasible at the same time.
Alternatively, they can consider amending/extending 315 and make it
ply Sgn Ave 2;i.e. after getting out of Lor Chuan, instead of
turning left to Boundary Road, it go straight on to Ave 2, and turn
left at the Upp Sgoon Road Junction. If this is used,315 will prob
need to have 2 different plates like 410. however, the route to
Serangoon Gdn and Sgn North remains the same.
I dont know if this is feasible, and wonder if anyone has suggested
b4 since the opening of the NEL. if it has been suggested b4 and
was rejected, i would like to know the reason they give.
thank.[/b]