tranquilice SG Of course, service 10 doesn't pass through the 2 mentioned areas. The residents of both towns got this new service at the inconvenience of Clementi residents. If SBST did not introduce service 188, service 10 now will most probably remain in Clementi.
cck_190 SG look on the bright side...SBS gave 1 town inconvenience for the enjoyment of 2 towns See how good they are to CCK back then...
leeJZ SG Could they have made Sv 10 do the following? Current Route - West Coast Rd - Clementi Ave 2 - C'wealth Ave West - Clementi Int? Or since Sv 188 is now with TIBS couldnt they reroute Sv 10 again?
service_238 SG Its only Mk4 DMs, VSOs and a couple of Mk5s. Bishan gets VSOs too! while the rest are Merz and Scanias.... I have planned CBS32 (which is SBST10) to ply inside Kent Ridge Dr before terminating at Kent Ridge Terminal. Watch out for more on my Tampines Bus Plan in http://buses.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=69437&page=13
tranquilice SG I feedback this route to SBST before but was rejected. Seems like service 10 will remain in Kent Ridge for the years to come.
service_238 SG It came to my mind this afternoon of my CBS32 to terminate at clementi. But for now... its kent ridge because CBS' JEDEP isnt built yet. JEDEP (Jurong East Depot) is located at Toh Guan Rd East. and moreover kent ridge services are based in CBS' ARBP.
cck_190 SG Must, must agree with you on that. CCK got the second townlink service CCK was fortunate to have 190 extended there CCK had quite good buses CCK Interchange's design is quite nice,designed by SBS??? Would you say that CCK has the same treatment from tibs as it had from SBS?
tranquilice SG CCK interchange is definately not designed by SBS. As for treatment, different people have different views.
cck_190 SG The architect who designed interchanges is quite good. What I mean is that you can tell whether an interchange belongs to SBS or TIBS. The architect for SBS ints at that time gave SBS ints a sort of cultural and classic look. Tampinese, Pasir Ris & CCK int almost look the same in terms of the designs
SBS9818A SG Many interchanges designed around the same timeframe look similar. Case in point, Bishan, S'goon, BB, CCK, etc.
cck_190 SG But Tibs interchanges built during that time: Only Yishun And Old Woodland Int have a more economical look while SBS ints have a more contemporary look...a few only such as CCK, Tam, Bishan & Pasir Ris. BB int have a more economical look. bty, when didcck int open?
foxtrot1985 SG Erm then can anyone explain the case for Sengkang when it is actually built later than Toa Payoh?
service_238 SG Sengkang was integrated with the SEK Central Town Plan. In any case ask the town planners for SEK central.
