I had wrote in many, but only one (or two) got
implemented.
a. A direct connection between Holland Ave and Commonwealth MRT.
(TIBS 5 was withdrawn then due to start up of BPLRT)
Fortunately, TIBS implemented TIBS 970. Probably it had received
far too many complaints regarding its withdrawal.
b. Written for a more direct link between BV MRTand NUS. (SBST 95
terminate at NUH then). Now SBST 95 has been extended to NUS.
Here are some that were not get implemented:
a. To have SBST 145 and SBST 32 loop at Holland Ave, Holland Road,
North Buona Vista Road and Commonwealth Ave West, rather than
terminating at BV Terminal.
The looping enables BV residents more services to link to MRT
stations.
b. To have a direct link between Dover MRT to Kent Ridge via
Commonwealth Ave West, Clementi Road, University Highway and Kent
Ridge. I had proposed for extending SBST 145, 32, 111 or 100 to be
extended to Kent Ridge.
c. Science Park 2 (not 1) and BV MRT can be better linked. SBST 200
is only 4 bus stops away. However many are not aware and thus SBST
200 was not popular. See the crowd at Clementi Interchange boarding
for Science Park 2 Shuttle Bus service, SBST 200 does not warrant
such fate.
Science Park 2 can be better linked if there is a slip road linking
itself to South Buona Vista Road.
d. I had requested for TIBS 61 or TIBS 75 to amend to ply between
Clementi Road and Dover MRT along Commonwealth Ave West.
Currently SBST had monopoly with SBST 74 plying between Clementi
Road and Dover MRT.
e. Many years back when SBST 200 loop at Sixth Ave, I had proposed
for its extension to Dunearn Road to NTU/NIE. That shall allow many
students along Dunearn Road to have more direct link to BV MRT
stations. This amendment allows BV residents to have a more direct
link to Bukit Timah Road and Dunearn Road. Imagine spending $1.13
to travel to Chinese High from Holland Drive with SBST 74.
Unfortunately it was not considered.
f. I had complaints for cutbact=k of TIBS 106 to suntec. And had
proposed for it to loop at Sungei Road (Near Sim Lim Square)
instead. My argument why have an amended route that ply exactly
with existing TIBS 77???