Servant,
You mean you are so bad in reading our comments?
Most nonchristians do agree with the proven historical and
archaeological parts of the bible.
What we find dubious and unconvincing are the supernatural
stuff, like those found in Greek religion and Theistic Taoism. E.g
Jade Emperor forming humans from clay, story of Ne Zha and the
supernatural account of Kwan Yin and Zeus, Hades and Poseidon.
Yes some of these "mythological" figures MIGHT have walked the
earth as real people, thats why people record it down and mention
them. But are their supernatural claims real?
To repeat what I said on 17 May 2012 (let's try underlining the
bold words, maybe that will make a difference):
Even if the historical and
archaeological evidence says otherwise? Sorry, I thought we are
supposed to be scientific :)
And speaking of science, the
evidence affirms the authencity of the
Bible as a
whole. I'm not sure there are
credible scientists or historians who say, "Yes, this document
is authentic, but hey, this part sounds a little crazy,
so let's exclude it." And by the way, the crazy or 'magic stuff' as
you put it, is your own arbitary
standard.
I'm sorry, but science and
historical research doesn't quite work this way.
You can either choose to make progress in this discussion, or
waste everyone's time. Your choice.
Come to think of it, now I'm wondering - did you even read the
article?