this jewish historian was in Jerusalem with his historian father
at the time when Jesus was supposedly around, neither of them made
a single mention of Jesus or Christians.
hundreds or over a thousand years later, Bishop Eusebius forged
entries in Josephus's work - mentioning Jesus in a single
paragraph.
considering that Jesus was also jewish and he was performing all
sorts of miracles, surely Josephus would have written tons of
material on him.
The topic is,
Jesus could not have died nailed to the cross as there is no
evidence that the Romans crucified prisoners 2000 years ago.
so, the point to ponder is this;
Is there any evidence that the Romans crucified
prisoners 2000 years ago (outside Christian sources).
The examples and other sources I cited, shows that there are
indeed records outside christian sources that record that the
Romans did crucified their prisoners 2000 years ago.
so this argument (that Romans don't crucified their
prisoners) used to show Jesus could not have died
nailed to the cross could not be estiblished.
