Well, let me summarise wat u r trying to say here in a more
simple form and u can comment to see if it is right or not
U r trying to say tat people, who subscribe to morality from
living in a group, r equally stupid as people who believe in
religion. This is because u feel tat if we break all forms of
morality, then life will be more successful to u
True, if u r a person who is too moral and fear of offending
other people in life, it is true tat u r impeded. However if u ask
me, even those very successful people who have little morals had
certainly live reasonably moral-ful life. There is a limit set on
how immoral u can be, and tat is really called law.
Take for example a selfish businessman who exploit the abour
market and pay peanuts to his workers. Though he did not pay his
workers fairly, he still live in a social manner and did not break
the order of society. If u talk about a colleague who goes around
backstabbing people and bad mouthing others to get himself a
promotion, although he is someone we hate a lot, he still follows
the minimum requirement of living in a society and did not break
its code. If these examples r not the kind u mean, perhaps u could
state it out
I think believing in religion or not, is simply whether u
believe in it or not. My belief won't change the world. But at
least knowing reality could helps me more. Do u agree tat knowing
the truth of the world could help u handle it better ?
You still don't understand it do you? There are no limits. There
are no laws.
The only law is power, and the will to it. You trying to say
that maybe there are limits are but the result of the slave
mentality soceity has put into you trying to restrain you by
default.
Quite simply. Religion or Weak Athiesm (which is the majority of
athiests) are either true or false, but they cannot be good or bad.
There is no good or bad. There is only weak and strong. The problem
with weak athiesm is that in many respects it is worse then
religion, the people are supposedly free to see the nature of
reality but yet are in self denial.
At the very least the religious on the opiate have the will,
even if in delusion, to power. The weak athiests are disorganised
and ineffective, they are always searching for a creed but never
have the will to it. Basically they are neutered religion, and they
make a lot of noise. Weak athiesm is infantile, they devote their
attention to debunking religion because it is a good distraction
from actually needing to deal with their own slave-mentality.
The Strong, Real Athiest- in fact the term athiest is
irrelevant, he is simply superman. Is beyond all this nonsense. The
fact that both the religious and athiestic try to oppose him with
their weak arguments trying to pertain to a herd slave mentality is
an indication of his superiority.