Dear Breytonhartge:
Although i agree to a certain limited extent of what you say, i
do not agree of the terms that you use.
"christianity offers a soothing balm to a wicked generation to
ease their guilt without telling people the hard truth of the word
of Yahweh" -- i would rather say, some, or even majority of the
churches. Half of the Gospel isn't enough. But we are to lovingly
point out what they lack, instead of being indifferent or just pure
hate.
And to a certain extent, i have indeed said some points to which
would somewhat echo you
"So Jesus, came to this world, to suffer the wrath of
God [that was aimed at us] in our place, so we could have
eternal life in Him. And a hope eternal." --in an earlier post by
me
"And we should also look into the FULL council of God." --
in an earlier post by me as well
The Word of God requires of us to treat it with care and
trembling. I assume you would agree.
regards,
Don
and yet, it is the church that does not treat it with care and
trembling.
and so what is this hope eternal that you speak of? or is your
definition akin to that put forth by christianity?
After getting this hope eternal, then what are you as a believer
supposed to do with it?
christianity is not true to the word of Yahweh. It never has
been otherwise it would not be in the state that it is in today. so
then in your words, what do the churches lack??