I do not agree with the statement that it is "chauvinistic", but
neither do I agree with Chin Eng's comment that the quote passage
should be deemed obsolete.
If you read the lines quoted, they make no reference to any
cultural standings, but rather are stated matter-of-factly.
Also, note that Genesis 3:16-19 states:
Then the LORD said to the woman, "You will suffer terribly when
you give birth. But you will still desire your husband, and he will
rule over you." The LORD said to the man, "You listened to your
wife and ate fruit from that tree. And so, the ground will be under
a curse because of what you did. As long as you live, you will have
to struggle to grow enough food. Your food will be plants, but the
ground will produce thorns and thistles. You will have to sweat to
earn a living; you were made out of soil, and you will once again
turn into soil." (Gen 3:16-19)
Man may have biases due to their own backgrounds, experiences,
knowledge and view of things, but God does not. From the beginning,
after the original sin was committed, God has already proclaimed
that man and woman shall encounter different difficulties in life,
and have different way of feeling things. Not only that, God had
defined the roles of both genders.
Notice that for the woman, God focused on the domestic side of
things, and for the man, the external side of things. It is thus
apparent that since the fall of Man, the role of woman is within
the home and man's is with the outside. Teaching and leadership
outside of the home is thus the role of the man, which is why the
woman should not interfere, but at home, the woman makes the
decision. Neither one is more important, or higher in stature than
the other. It is simply different roles. Our bodies are built
differently, our natures, our emotions, our ways of expressing what
we feel or think. It's all perfectly designed in God's purpose for
the individual genders.