A qn from an atheist

last SG · 2007-10-23T15:55:01+00:00

The number 0 in mathematics has a similar case. How did the concept of zero meaning nothingness come about? You could have as many circular arguments as you...

AndrewPKYap SG

It is not, "the best of scientists admit that," it is they go Rolling Eyes

Disprove to me that some of the strange things that happens in the world is not the result of a cow-like looking creature sending as yet undiscovered signals affecting the brains of some humans.

That is the reason why millions of people worship the cow. They were given a vision of these "cow-like looking " and they misinterpret the vision of "cow-like looking" creatures as the cows on earth.

Now disprove that and if you cannot, OK, please join my cow-worshiping society that is slightly better than Christianity because, hey, the cows charge only 9% of your income.

You want testimonies of the benefits of worshiping the cow? First brother, you must believe and have faith. Once you believe and have faith you will see for yourself the power, glory and majesty of the cows in your life.

Cows bless you brother Ivan.

If you are really interested, I will tell you the story about the calf....

Before you reply to this post, please don't ask me for proof, just believe in faith because, you know, to quote an eminent philosophy, "I cannot conclusively, by the ways of the world, PROVE the existence of Cow, but neither can you conclusively (using science) DISPROVE the existence of Cow. Even the best of scientists admit that, and you dont? Rolling Eyes

jondizzle foshizzle SG

Originally posted by stupidissmart:

Com'on, tat is really lame. Science tells us electricity come from dynamo, it is repeatable, it is tested, it is true and it works. And tat is how we got electricity. If science is not right, it won't work. Without science, we do not know wat is dynamo, we cannot generate electricity and we live in caves hunting rabbits. The study on natural phenomenon give us the ability to change our environment and make things work.

Why don't u just answer tis question

[b]If man do not have science, do they have computer monitors ?

If u answer yes, then u r delusional and I guess any tom dick and harry can tell u tat [/b]

Exactly what I mean. Science tells us electricity comes from dynamo but it is the electricity and dynamo which causes the monitor to work, not science. Science just tells us how it works. And I agree, without science we wouldn't have been able to harness the power of electricity but again it is not science which causes the monitor to work it is the electricity, we have just harnessed it in a way to make it work.

stupidissmart SG

Exactly what I mean. Science tells us electricity comes from dynamo but it is the electricity and dynamo which causes the monitor to work, not science. Science just tells us how it works. And I agree, without science we wouldn't have been able to harness the power of electricity but again it is not science which causes the monitor to work it is the electricity, we have just harnessed it in a way to make it work.

Then science is right and is proven to work isn't it ?

If u insist tat science is not making the monitor in front of u work, tat knowledge and understanding is not important to make monitor work, then I can say your brain is not doing any work too. When u walk u use your legs and not your brains. When u give a presentation u use your mouth and not your brains. When u read, u read as though u r brainless because u use your eyes and when u write, it is as though u have not used your brain because u use your finger and hand to write. So your brain is useless and doesn't contribute ?

AndrewPKYap SG

errr... I think he won't understand unless you use the phrase "The Scientific Method"

We use it inter-changeably but some people have no idea what they are talking about and yet want to participate in the discussions and make a fool of themselves by arguing with people...

jondizzle foshizzle SG

HAHAHAHAHAH OMFG ANDREWPKYAP DOESNT KNOW WHAT AN ARGUMENT IS LOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOL>LLLL HE THINKS HE KNOWS THE MEANING OF WORDS BETTER THAN THE DICTIONARY HERE ILL SHOW U:

ar¡¤gu¡¤ment /ˈ¨»rgyəmənt/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ahr-gyuh-muhnt] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
¨Cnoun 1. an oral disagreement; verbal opposition; contention; altercation: a violent argument.
2. a discussion involving differing points of view; debate: They were deeply involved in an argument about inflation.
3. a process of reasoning; series of reasons: I couldn't follow his argument.
4. a statement, reason, or fact for or against a point: This is a strong argument in favor of her theory.
5. an address or composition intended to convince or persuade; persuasive discourse.
6. subject matter; theme: The central argument of his paper was presented clearly.
7. an abstract or summary of the major points in a work of prose or poetry, or of sections of such a work.
8. Mathematics. a. an independent variable of a function.
b. Also called amplitude. the angle made by a given vector with the reference axis.
c. the angle corresponding to a point representing a given complex number in polar coordinates. Compare principal argument.

9. Computers. a variable in a program, to which a value will be assigned when the program is run: often given in parentheses following a function name and used to calculate the function.

read 1. and all have a laugh at AndrewPKYap's complete lack of intelligence. Even a 10 year old knows what an argument is Laughing

now that we've ended this argument please stay on topic or you'll just be another troll

AndrewPKYap SG

please refer to the post at "24 October 2007 · 07:42 AM" on this page

http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=287320&page=4

AndrewPKYap SG

second thoughts, I might as well just copy and paste it here:

yeah right, of course you rather I stop exposing your gross stupidity... I asked to you show me where, in that thread, you made a cohesive argument and you asked me to find it for myself because have been doing that all over the thread and it turned out your definitions of a cohesive argument was: "a verbal disagreement". Laughing

Those two quotes above are just "samples". There are a lot more "samples' if you want. After my relentless Laughing at your gross stupidity, you finally manage to copy and paste something not so grossly stupid, and after how many days? Rolling Eyes

To the mods: I am trying to raise the standards of debate in your forum hor... and exposing the grossly stupid posts and it is not flaming because I back up my assertions fully with evidence.[/url]

jondizzle foshizzle SG

Science is a concept, concepts can't cause things to work. It's like saying a foot works because of biology. A foot doesn't work because of biology a foot works because of muscles and the nervous system, etc. Biology merely allows us to understand how it works.

Science enabled us to create the monitor but it doesn't directly cause it to work.

jondizzle foshizzle SG

LOL U FRIGGIN IDIOT HOW CAN U DISAGREE WITH THE DICTIONARY ABOVE??

Notice to everyone --- AndrewPKYap thinks he's right and the dictionary is wrong. What an arrogant deluded cunt. And btw, I never said a cohesive argument is a verbal disagreement, I said an argument is a verbal disagreement.

Second notice to everyone --- AndrewPKYap doesn't know the difference between a cohesive argument and an argument.

stupidissmart SG

Making monitor totally depends on science. Without it we do not know how to make electricity. We do not know how to process material. We do not know how to make chips or LCD. Without science, men don't have monitors. Because we have monitors, it prove the concepts of science r true and right.

As said if understanding and knowldge is not important, then our brain is not important.

jondizzle foshizzle SG

Exactly making the monitor depends on science. But like you said it's the materials, the chips and the LCD which causes the monitor to work. And no it doesn't prove the concepts of science are true and right, it only proves the concept of science is true when it applies to making monitors.

sillyme SG

Please refrain from personal attacks.

I think the way the discussion has progressed, the "argument" will go on and on. I am personally very sick of discussion of such nature.

Since the threadstarter has not been participating in this discussion, this thread shall be locked.

« Previous Page