Your view is heretical. In fact it is the Sabellian heresy
during the early years.
http://www.exchangedlife.com/Sermons/topical/trinity/heresies1.shtml/
Monarchianism
This is also called Modalism or the Sabellian heresy. Noetus of
Smyrna first proposed this doctrine at the end of the second
century, beginning of the third century. Modalistic Monarchian
doctrine was accepted and popularized by Sabellius at the beginning
of the third century. Sabellius was excommunicated in Rome for this
teaching. Modalism teaches that the Trinity is one God revealed in
one person or mode. The Father is the Son, is the Holy Spirit. They
are all different temporary modes of the same God.
Modalism/Monarchian doctrine usually did not deny the deity of
Christ; instead they claim that the Son is the Father, not the
eternal Son as part of historic Christianity.
Many church fathers wrote detailed responses against this doctrine
(as we saw in the previous section). One term coined for those who
held this heresy was 'Patripassianists' because they taught that
the Father suffered on the cross. Other sects teach that Jesus was
only a man who received power from God. Noetus, Praxeas, and
Sabellius were the prominent teachers of this heresy.
The church responds:
Tertullian criticized this view in his theological argument against
Praxeas:
We define that there are two, the Father and the Son, and three
with the Holy Spirit, and this number is made by the pattern of
salvation...[which] brings about unity in trinity, interrelating
the three, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. They are of
one substance and power, because there is one God from whom these
degrees, forms and kinds devolve in the name of Father, Son and
Holy Spirit. (Against Praxeas p. 156-7).
