Don't keep on harping on physical resurrection. Furthermore, the
term 'physical' here is vague.
I already clarified, many posts before, that I am not defending my
using of the term spiritual. I am sorry to confuse you.
The issue has always been whether the resurrection talked about is
full of holes or glorified.
The OT, common Jewish folks in 1st century Palestine (exemplied by
Lazarus' sister), and Paul (who exemplified the educated rabbi) all
thinks it is the glorified version.
It was you who tried to bring the glorified version and the holes
version, as accounted by the gospel and acts, together.
Then suddenly, you mention that 1 Cor is actually talking about the
Second Coming!! What does the Second Coming Resurrection have to do
with Gospel Account Resurrection?!
I dunno whether the humble pie is in your mouth now or not. Or have
you swallowed it without telling us? 
