My problem with this is that.
1) how do we know who is anointed, the pastor? or the one who
oppose?
Alternative: in King David's case, the one who make the statement
is David (the anointed one) and not Saul (the one whom you claim
the anointing had already left), if you want to comapre apples to
apples, then are you can also say the one making the statement is
the anointed one, hence the pastor making the statement.
so, since we is not able to really ascertain which is which, would
it be better not to presume?
2) In the context, David was refering to Saul who was once
anointed, David reason on not touching the Lord's anointed is that
he (David) is trusting God to do the right thing. In this case of
an supposingly errant pastor/leader, can we also trust God to do
the right thing?
cheers.
