I will be to the point.
Please learn some critical use of your sources... for all intents
and means your appeal on the validity of your sources fall on the
mere argument that we ought to accept them for no other
reason because they are extra-Christian, and that it would be
inprudent not to consider them.
Granted an outright refusal without debate would be inprudent, but
before we launch into a long tirade and dogfight of argument on the
validity of your sources, it would be good for you yourself to
wonder if you having considered your sources valid on any other
grounds besides the fact that it was extra-Christian.
I for example might accept a seccular humanist point on view on the
nazis, and not the 'Christian' KKK organization's one. Obviously
sheer religion is not a factor for me in considering sources, I
bide you the same argument. All the same you have made your case
before doing a critical proof of your sources beyond the argument
that we ought to listen to it if we are not scared. I will
tell you this, I am not scared to listen to them, but all the same
I do not accept them yet as valid.
Do we dare launch into a long debate on this?