scenario

last SG · 2006-06-07T01:01:30+00:00

Laoda my friend. REad the Denominational distinctves thread...

vince69 SG

don't think this is the reason, in the first place, God had said they are opposing Moses and is like opposing Him(God); ie; not giving face to God; why would God worried about his (Aaron) face?

but you may be right on Aaron being the high priest, cause if he kenna also, then he will consider unclean and cannot perform the high priest duty.

Icemoon SG

at most you call him a hypocrite. but this has not much to do with doctrines and statements of faith.

just like Luther .. tearing up the epistle when the bible is divinely inspired? If he has no basic respect for the Word of God, then why should we listen to his looney arguments about grace and faith?

Icemoon SG

they have no 2IC meh? Laughing

M©+square SG

Let me try again.

In which form was he just a hypocrite???
By taking lives away. It doesn't affect his preaching?
I suppose any christian writer could have their way with secret sins and people who read their teachings would treat two matters seperately. At most, they'll just be called hypocrites. Viewership and followers abounds.

It's not my fight anyway. But are you thinking?

Cheers

vince69 SG

no, only 1 high priest is allow at one single time, cannot have more than 1.

M©+square SG

LIVES LIVES LIVES

It's different platform....you understand?!

Icemoon SG

So the divine Word of God is on a lower platform than lives?

why are so many people losing their lives over the Word of God then?

Icemoon SG

I'm not too sure whether he was the kind who killed relentlessly or who was in a bad dilemma.

I read the wiki which says it was not clear whether he personally approved of the killing of Seventus.

Who cares about his preaching? I care more about his message. Wink

M©+square SG

Then this discussion will stop.

Cheers

Icemoon SG

why? you ran out of ammo? Twisted Evil

Cheers.

laoda99 SG

A part of myself tells me something wrong with John Calvin since he kills, but another part tells me not to totally throw out his theology.

Which part of me shall I obey?

M©+square SG

There's no point.

Since you regard the word of God more important.
And that 'men shall rever and serve the word' kind of message.

Think about it? Which in God's eyes is more important?

Then again....forget about it. It'll take a long long time to get to you.

MC

M©+square SG

He didn't only approve the death of one live.
There's more to it.

Icemoon SG

Mc2 gives me the impression that 'theorists' like Calvin came out with their own 'theories'. Since Calvin is a bad apple (bloodthirsty rotten apple to be accurate), his 'theory' is also rotten.

Ad hominem.

What irony. Didn't the reformers stress on Sola Scriptura? What theories are there to speak of?

M©+square SG

Laughing

I seriously think you should re read my post again and again and again.
If you don't understand, ask.

CHao.

Icemoon SG

I didn't regard the Word of God as more important. The Christians do and did.

You asking me which in God's eyes is more important? Of course the Word of God lah. If you belong to the Baal Sect, then too bad for you. If you belong to the Egyptian first born, then too bad for you too. So tell me, which in God's eyes is more important? Wink

M©+square SG

There, i told that there's no point is this disccusion.

Laughing

Forget it.
My point is made clear. And you stand on yours.

Icemoon SG

This is your post. I have read it again and again.

it was his methodology in handling of Lives and practicing the word which made me a unbeliever of his calvinist theory.

Double Standard.

Cheers

Ad hominem.

Do you need a refresher course on logic 101?

laoda99 SG

I have decided to follow the bible.... Mr. Green

Icemoon SG

Sorry, you aren't even engaging me.

you have not refuted any arguments or examples of mine.

« Previous Page Next Page »