You are most welcome.
Dont u think no news is good news? Most of the headline news u see
nowadays in ST, LHZB, LHWB, Sin Min, TNP, CNN, BBC, CNA, Today etc
are bad news. Mideast conflicts, terrorism, environmental
disasters, bird flu, corruption, NKF saga, SAVH politicking,
murders, suicides, conmen, Ah Hao & Huang Na, thefts,
robberies, earthquakes, ppl dying, tsunamis, hurricanes(lots of
them-break record), maids killing employers, Constance Song vs
pimp, corporate scandals like CAO, Citiraya etc, rise of petrol
price, incr in ERPs & bus fares, the New Poor, Paris burning,
paedophiles, younger ppl getting AIDS, & so on & on. Maybe
newspapers thrive on these news, or else how to make
profit?
Well this totally contradicts the entire purpose of the
apocalyse forum. You are freely disseminating "NEWS". If no news is
really good news indeed, why put up that forum?
Yes, i want ppl to read but NOT advertise like this. It's not meant
to be a pte forum but MY forum for others to share their views.
Actually I really love this line. It's really about YOU isn't
it? In spite of your postulating about doing it for Jesus, it is
really about feeding your ego and your need to feel wanted?
Otherwise why is it YOUR forum?
Hello brother, I know u have great linguistic ability. Or maybe u r
trained as a lawyer or doctor or professor of English or biologist.
A writer of course with yrs of training can dissect paragraphs. A
lawyer can dissect a plaintiff or defendant until he has no words
to say. A doctor can also dissect a patient to take out his
cancerous tumour or baby. A professor of English needless to say is
superb in dissecting my common english words, with all the wrong
form, verbs, grammar, preposition, vowels, alphabets, sentence
structure etc. Or a biologist can dissect a toad or frog or
cockcroach or rat to examine its internal organs. Sorry i am not
trained as either of any, so pls forgive me if i cant withstand
your dissection. Bcos ordinary poor man in the street mah!
Boh liao or not, it's up to the viewers. Then why ppl still go to
boh liao R(A) movies, read boh liao books, go to boh liao websites,
laugh at boh liao comedians etc. Pls dont be so serious can or not
uncle?
I do not bother to dissect boh liao movies, say from Stephen Chow.
But assuming the movie has a social message, you'd find that such
genre is always under heavy criticism (dissection?).
You are right. Nobody has monopoly of facts. Which is why each
individual can and will conclude issues their own way. I happen to
like to sieve through all the information given to derive a
conclusion. If I don't that, I will be accepting, at face value,
all your "cultic" links in the past. Are you now saying that I
should not have dissected your post and allow such links to
misinform our readers? Or when you come across a writer who says
one thing today and another tomorrow, you will also accept it at
face value.
So does it mean that because nobody has monopoly of facts, nobody
should argue or debate or in this case dissect other writers
posting? Like it or not we all dissect, even you, when you wrote
your last note.
Yes, facts very impt but nobody has monopoly of facts & nobody
knows everything. Maybe u know much more than younger ppl here
& they sound immature or act immature, BUT dont u think that's
what young ppl say or do-immature(young so immature what?)? U were
young once, did anybody comment u r immature also? Let us all learn
from our mistakes. No need to dissect everything. Even if u
correctly dissect, pls dont put down ppl. Remember u're uncle ok?
So what uncle do? Take care of the nephews
what?!
In the past, before the internet came, our mistakes are usually
privy to a few people. Now when someone put up a piece of
information in such a forum, nobody knows the level of understand
of the writer. It may be a secondary school kid who has a good
intention, but wrong facts. When encountered with such a situation
and you know that the information is wrong, what do you do? Didn't
Paul rebuked the churches when they erred?
If nobody attempts to analyse such erroneous writing, you think the
writer can learn? If I did not attempt to inform the readers that
some links has cultic origins, the writers will know?
As I had said before, don't want people to dissect, write
responsibly, check your facts. I am not even going to attempt to
ask people to write with proper grammar, even though it will be
helpful for people to understand the note.
You are aware that people are not able to understand you,
right?
Yes I am an uncle. I am also a father of two kids. When they do
wrong, I punish. Of course, my first course of action is to
counsel, if that doesn't work, I make sure that adequate and
relevent punishment is meted out. Otherwise, how did my kids turn
up to be what they are today?
