My question to you is still, what's wrong with making money? If
they think a movie is the best way to share their discovery to the
world, who are you to criticise them? Are you saying they shouldn't
make a single cent? Oh .. maybe they should ask Golden Village to
charge us $1 per entry right?
Well, then why do u seems to stop me when I mention tat a
possible moltivation for their movie is to earn money 
If they think tat
making a movie on... well... really no discovery and earning big
money from it is okay, then so be it
They never found empirical evidence the tallest mountains are
covered by the flood. Who told you that?
Then watever things they say about the evidence of the flood
become irrelevant to the bible since the bible states tat the flood
covered the whole earth till the tip of the highest mountain
I never said you said religion is best seller. Read again. I
said religion don't sell, or at least orthodox religion don't sell.
Only conspiracy theories like Da Vinci Code sells.
COm'on, the previous reply u r using lord of the rings etc and u
r comparing with "pop culture" without a word on whether does
religion sell. U think religion don't sell, then why does Hill
songs get to sell so much record, da vinci code get so much
attention and even the cds from HYS get to sell so fast.
Also .. you conveniently forgot one thing - the documentary is
in chinese. Use your brain. Can a chinese documentary with no
conspiracy no famous actor and actresses and director sell?
U forgot one thing. There r a lot of chinese who r christians in
canada, china, singapore, malaysia, hong kong and taiwan. In fact
they made up a big market out there. On comparing with chinese
films with leading actresses etc r again another weak comparison. U
heard of fahrenheit 911 ?
All secret meh? Cannot be lah. I said the public do not have
readily access, unless the govt grants permission.
The mountain the film says the people cannot access readily. At
least this was true when the film was made.
However they do not go to wat u described as great depth where
the army camp cannot be filmed even with the guidance of its own
people. In fact it was label as a national park now really shows
tat there is really little or perhaps nothing about military
secrets on the mountians. Otherwise why make it become a national
park almost after a few weeks ? In tis sense u r still wrong.
Whether the people can access it easily it already become a matter
of, well, one sided story.
When they tried to apply for permission, the evidence wasn't
found yet (obviously right?). Now they have some evidence. The govt
knows they are not there to dig out military secrets. So the place
is open? wahahha
Why do u think tat the opening up of mount ararat has anything
tyo do with the documentary ? IMO I think they don't even know
anything about the documentary at all. It is now a national park.
If there r so many secret bases there then u wouldn't expect them
to change their stand completely and allowing any tom dick and
harry over. U think shifting a military base is as simple as ABC ?
In all fairness, the govt officially opened up the place at on
1st of November 2004 according to your article, but the expediton
was carried out during October. So whatever I said was correct 'cos
the govt haven't opened up during the expedition.
Lets put it tis way. If the gov wanna open it as a national
park, we expect the preparation for such a launch to take perhaps
months before it finalized. The claims tat they were stopped from
bringing more people because of closely guarded military secrets do
not hold much water especially now perhaps anyone with money can go
over for a holiday or to find their "ark".
Muslims and Jews are not interested in evangelism. At most those
evidence affirm their own faith only.
And they loved to have a chance to affirm their own faith. As
said if it is there the muslim people and gov there would have done
a conclusive search to affirm their faith
Well .. since u so sure can u just throw me some muslim and
jewish websites that support your argument? I am quite sure they
never say non believers will go to hell. You want to lump them
together with Christians you got to prove to us. 'cos the common
understanding is only Christianity preaches exclusive
salvation.
For muslims
http://www.themodernreligion.com/comparative/christ/christ_trap.htm
Many times, Muslims fail to
realize that the Islamic concept of salvation is not based upon
good deeds, but is based primarily upon faith.
In the dozens of times Allah (SWT) talks in the Quran about
salvation, he always states, "Those who believe and do good
deeds."
Belief is always mentioned before deeds or works.
http://www.answering-christianity.com/que6.htm
Many times, Muslims fail to
realize that the Islaamic concept of salvation is not based upon
good deeds, but is based primarily upon faith
For judaism, well they do speak tat non-believers get a chance to
go to heaven.
