1. Valid only for Christians. Non-Christians, I don't care. I
will never impose my views on anyone.
People who r christian will have tis view and treat gays, even
if they r from other faith differently.
2. Romans and 1 Corinthians is written in plan English, in many
versions and languages saying the same thing.
Leviticus 11 :7 'Regard the pig as unclean, for though has a
cloven hoof, it does not chew the cud
11.10: 'Of all that lives in the waters of the seas and rivers, you
may eat anything that has fins and scales
11.11: 'But anything in the seas or rivers that does not have fins
and scales, regard as an abomination. Do not eat their meat and
regard their carcasses as an abomination
Looking at the verse tat states eating prawns/pork is wrong and is
written in plain english, in many version and languages and they
all say the same thing. Yet christian still eat prawns as much as
any other people
3. No other verses (including Eccl 7:13) has positive things to
say about homosexuality.
No other verses say anything good about eating prawns/pork
either. So shouldn't the pope made a stand on tis ?
4. Unless you can provide something from the Bible that allow
another dimension to the Romans and Corinthians passage, those
passages stands.
Unless anyone can provide something from the bible tat allow
people to eat prawns/pork, the verse still stand. As true
christian, u should refrain from eating these food.
5. As the argument is only for gay-Christian (and their
supporters) the assumption is that these people recognise that the
Bible is the Word of God.
It is not only about believers but non-believers as well since
christian impression of them has been guided toward a different
course due to a remark made by a religious leader
