Yes, a microevolution do occur. I agree with u that organism
retain what is good and rejects what is bad for improvement to
itself. Then let me ask u a question. Do u think that always remain
being stupid is something good? So u see, if chicken would realize
about this situation, they wont be slaughter for man to eat them.
Or birds get shoot down. The fact is, they couldnt do anything
about it is due to their limited intellectual capability. Goats ,
cow have been always a source of food for mankind since prehistoric
age. But until today..they have not even improve slightly in thier
intelectual. So..nothing drastic had happen in any evolution.
Hence..i could say no macroevolution actually happen.
Logic ? Sad to say, mentioning about domestic animals just prove
evolution. Dogs r believed to be from wolves, cat believed from
jungle cats, pigs boar etc. Now they have became the domesticated
animals we see today. Can they survive when we place them in jungle
? No !
Secondly, evolution doesn't mean tat they have to be smarter. It
can mean being able to fly longer, faster or being able to
reproduce faster or get sick less easily. All these r potential
areas where the animals become fitter. In the case of domestic
animals, u can see them producing eggs more regularly, fatter and
less ferocious. As said be poopie head before, the probability tat
animals will evolved into becoming smarter is very low. And even if
tis is so, we r not going to see the effects for millions of
years.
Lastly, is natural selection in the case of domesticated animals ?
No ! Tis is because they r not undergoing "natural selection"
anymore. Who is to have offsprings who is to reproduce r controlled
by human. Naturally, they choose the animals tat give eggs more
regularly, or r born to be fatter so they can have a better yield.
Sorry man, evolution to these animals had become more or benefits
to man rather than to themselves.
I know it is difficult for u to accept or even TRY to understand
that creation exist. And dont always say there are no scietific
evidence or WE CREATIONIST have nothing to proof. To proof ur
statement wrong is already a proof by using science. Science and
maths are also extremely related.
Wat r u talking about ? U can't prove it and wat excuse r u
using ??
I see that there is no point exchanging ur views here. If this
goes on to even 14 pages...it wouldnt change a single thing. Even
if there are a few more similar threads...i could also see no
difference. It will not end. Simple..because u will not even accept
my fact though it sounds logical, because ur mind and soul ( oops u
dun believe in one) will not tolerate any facts that go against
your stand on evolution.
Huh ?!?! Where got logical ?? I think evolutionist is the one
who should say tat ! U do not accept the facts even though there r
overwhelming evidences against u. Maybe it is already because ur
mind will not tolerate any facts that go against your stand on
creation.
No point quoting other scientists or proffesors who are on the
same boat as u too, because the most important person, it is u
urself. Even if majority of these intelectuall ppl are believers in
God, u will still stick with the minority % of the other who oppose
the existense of God.
Sorry man, statistically speaking, most people do not believe in
god. Secondly most reknowned scientist do not believe in god
either. Thirdly a big majority of scientist believes in evolution
more than creationist.
so just be a happy man. For those who are non - believers..u
have so much more freedom on earth; guiltiness is bliss. For the
believers, our main focus is our life after death. U can call us
stupid, no knowledge, no common sense or whatever, i would just
smile to u and carry my own way. Dun try to "save" me as much as u
dun wan others to "Save" you
The problem is u spend so much efoort on life after death when
there r no life after death !
