Originally posted by Sir_Horny:
I finally spend time reading the catholic website & found that
their article on "Gay Marriage" hillarious...the article is nothing
but beating around the bush on the subject itself.
In library about "Anti-Catholicism" the RC quote
[b]The problem is that, regardless of what it had in the past, the
modern Vatican is not fantastically wealthy. In fact, it has run a
budget deficit in most recent years and has an annual budget only
around the size of that of the Archdiocese of
Chicago.
.....anyone falling for this??
U have ears, eyes & brain to discern the truth & lies...use
it wisely that's all I have to say. If RC can attract so much
controversy, something must be wrong with the "church." Btw, u can
stop saying about me quoting from chick.....I've given u url that
has nothing to do with chick in my last reply...& I have also
read the article from the link u provided.
Quote from http://www.remnantofgod.org/nl031031.htm:
This also became more plausible in my mind after
researching how the Islamic faith came to be, and Romes obvious
involvement in it. History show that the Vatican arranged the
marriage of Mohammed and his wife who was a catholic, and the
Catholic bishops help Mohammed write the Koran and gain his power.
This was done by Papal Rome all in an effort to cause the Muslims
to hate the Jews, as well as all Christians who were not catholic.
Two birds with one stone if you will. Get rid of the Christians so
that Rome could stand as the supreme moral authority, and rid the
Jews of their land so that Rome can set her temples upon the holy
land in triumph. Of course history proves it backfired for the
Pope, which in turn caused him to growl across Europe in the
crusades that saw countless deaths for centuries. However lately,
it seems Jerusalem is finally within the grasp of Rome once
again!
http://www.reformation.org/vatican-and-islam.html[/b]
Thank you for your quotes. I have gone through the article on
the first weblink you provided and I don't find any references to
the source of the author's finding.
If RC can attract so much controversy, something must be wrong
with the "church."
Who in first place created so much controversy to make life so
challenging for the Catholics? Who's the one who said that the
Catholic church has the names of all Protestants in the world? Who
came out with the idea that the Pope wrote the Koran?
The second link that you provided, I went through that too. It was
pretty interesting as I am very into archaeologist findings from
time to time. But what doesn't impress me is how the author derive
his/her own assumptions in his/her own words. Things like "Bull
fights, Rosaries and Assassinations are from Islam". Buddhists use
rosaries too. Did they get it from the Moslems as well? The
creditability of the two authors' writings is a big question mark.
Like what you said earlier, I am going to say the same thing to you
:
U have ears, eyes & brain to discern the truth &
lies...use it wisely that's all I have to say.
When I put two articles together, one said that Catholics wrote
the Koran and the second said that the Catholics came from Islam.
So which is which?
It will be good if you could quote texts from history books or
ecyclopedia which give factual accounts on the history, rather than
articles written by the fundamentalists whose name and background
most of us never even heard of.
I have been busy these days and will not be taking part in so much
discussion. But I promise once I'm off my workload, I will update
the Catholic forum with topics on the fallacy of Chicks tracts and
some other erroneous writings on the Catholic Church.
SingaporeMacros, you're doing great.
