Ever considered that the so-called bones of the apes are hoax.
Lucy, one of the more pominent missing-link, was certified as a
hoax. The skeletons were collection of different animals, skull of
a ape, jaw bones of a pig, skeletons of human. Even the Peking Man
is a hoax. So technically, there is still no evidence of a
evolution in-between of a ape and human.
I believe there r tons of bones out there which r not hoax. I
expected some people to come out with bogus bones for thsi
evolution, but then the other few huindreds r genuine. So because
of a hoax set of bones u decide to knock down all the claims of the
others ? Technically, a link has been formed.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/knee-joint.html
here is more about lucy if u r interested in it
The link you provided didn't mention anything about hyena
evolving from leopard. From all the angles, the hyena still looks
like a wolf/dog to me. To change a leopard to a hyena, that's macro
evloution because you are changing an animal from a Cat species to
a Dog species. But a Chihuahua from a Pit Bull Terrier is more
probable. Dog to Dog. Micro Evolution. Christians will agree to
that.
The link I provided is just to show a picture on how hyena look.
The difference between the look of a hybrid between a leopard and a
wolf appears to be like hyena than the look between a chihuahua and
a pit bull. If u believe tat evolution brought the difference
between the pitbull and chihuahua, then why is it difficult to
visualise tat leopard may evolved to become more wolf like, which
is hyena before they evolved into leopards ?
BTW I put in the example of hyena because u r asking for in-between
evolution for horse and giraffe. I give u an example of an
in-between for a leopard and wolf
I think there are evidence of human existing with dinosaurs.
Human footprints have been found walking alongside dinosaur
footprint. Chihuahua will be hard to micro evloved to a pit bull
because the Chihuahua will not be able to gain genetic information.
Once again, in micro evolution or mutation, you can only lose
genetic information, you cannot gain. Pit Bull is a closer relative
to the wolf as Chihuahua is really at the bottom of the family
chart.
http://www.bibleandscience.com/science/footprints.htm
http://members.aol.com/paluxy2/paluxy.htm
Because of this evidence the film
Footprints in Stone was removed from circulation. Dr. John Morris
wrote Impact article 151 (1986) stating "none of the four tails at
the Taylor site can be today regarded as unquestionably
human."
In here they say tat the print found in one of the site is hoax..
it is declared to be dinosaur print, just tat the 3 toes prints
have been washed by erosion. It appears to be too large for men
too. In part of the trails which they say r "men" it is found tat
sudden appearence of dinosaur digit are found on it. Why will tat
be the case ?
I do not say tat these 2 (chihuahua & pitbull) will evolved
into the same kind, but whether have they come from the same
ancesters. If both pitbull and chihua comes from same ancesters,
then why do u think the leopard and dog do not come from the same
ancesters too.
I am not a scientist too! But really to change from an ape to a
man needs a change in DNA. But Evolution stats that we become more
intelligent. I did a little search and found that human have 46
chromosomes. Our so-called closest relative, the Chimps have 48
chromosomes. So did we became more intelligent than the chimp? Are
the chimp more evolved than us? In fact the chicken is even more
evloved than us and the chimp based on chromosomes count - 78,
almost twiced as intelligent. You see the controversy?
No one says tat having more chrosomes = more smarter. No one
says tat being tat were more evolved will turn out to be smarter
either. In the survival for fitness, the cockroach may be more
evolved than a dodo, but it still has a smaller size than dodo
isn't it ? Living things evolved differently to a different
direction. Not being as smart as human just means human has taken a
different step compared with the other animals. Birds can fly and
fish can swim, does it means flying animals r more advance than
swimming one ?
80% of Tribal people living in the ranges of Himalayas live past
105 years old. Human do have the capability to live to grand old
age.
Is there any tribal men tat lived beyond 200 ?
Many sites contains information about the very strange fact that
dinosaurs have such nostrils relative to their size and their
lungs. you can google it if you have the time. Again earthworms and
croaches can still live because of the relative to their size.
earthworm breath through their skin and the ration on the size
of pores on their skin is smaller compared with the ration of the
size nostrils for dinosaurs
Hmm...proof that mountains are 10,000 years old?
since u r not going to believe in radio dating, then how about
tis one
In spite of Morris heroic effort to reinterpret the
Petrified Forest of Yellowstone Park, the evidence is clear that a
nearby volcano buried 27 forests on top of each other. Some of the
trees have up to 400 rings. It took about 20,000 years for this to
form (Weber 1980, 2
.
Noah was already very very old when the flood occured. We are
seeing the poles melting today too but not at a very fast rate. Yet
it is still melting. i found information about how deep the ocean
need to drop in depth to allow us to walk all over the world, its
only 100 feet.
Noah lived for another 350 years after the flood isn't it
?
It is melting due to men, not natural. Tat is why there is the
issue of global warming or ozone depletion isn't it ? If we
consider only natural effect, then it takes million of years, not
2000 for the ice to melt to cover 100 feet.
Nope the rate of decay is not constant. And although something
can measure an age of something up to 50,000 years, it doesn;t mean
that there has to be something which is 50,000 years old.
It is constant... it can measure things up till 50,000 years,
after which it will be less accurate. Even though we cannot confirm
the exact figures for dinosaur bones, it is still greater than
50,000.
