Got such Law meh?

last SG · 2004-08-24T21:39:31+00:00

Admonishing the sinner is a spiritual work of mercy. If someone refuses to repent, then might as well not go to any church at all. How can you go to church i...

Sir_Horny SG

the moral of the story is every religions have some incosiderate Bastard Mr. Green

laurence82 SG

x2

Actually this incident reflects typical Singaporean behaviour rather than behaviour of certain religious groups.

wuming78 SG

absolutely. this is by no means a direct attack on the religion itself, but to those inconsiderate and selfish idiots. whether these idiots are muslim, chinese, etc, christian, islam, buddhist, etc, or simply going shopping, eating, etc, they deserve to be condemned.

TrU PeAce (^0*)v SG

Hmm...there are public law and private law. Public law includes constitutional law and criminal law. In S'pore, the constitution provides fundamental rights of citizens and these include freedom of speech. Criminal law is related to public. That means, any action that threaten the well being of the scoiety fall under this category. Public right is place more importance than individual right in law. Eg...u can sing...is ur right to sing ( individual right)...but if u sing at 4am..the well being of the society is being threaten...then u r consider to have commited an offence...if serious...a crime. So...this guy..has definetely threaten the well being of the society..even though he is personally right. He could have sue the car owner under private law...but he made a wrong move. Even the victims ( church goers) dun wan to sue him...but under crimal law, the victims have no say in whether a person is charged. Only the Attorney General can stop the prosecution.

hope this help.
To all catholics...pls park ur car properly. Amen.

Icemoon SG

Funny leh .. how did the police know the incident in the first place?

Must be someone bao toe mah ..

TrU PeAce (^0*)v SG

Yup yup...u r right..Someone mus bao toe. After police know about this incident....u wan to sue..or dun wan is not up to the victim choice. By just telling police..he come into church make noise is sufficient. No need to say...u wan to sue him...i wan to bring him to court. Except for private law. Then is up to u to sue him.
Eg...if someone punch ur face...u report police. the fellow scared liao, then he pay u S$10000 for not to sue him..and he beg u...So u tell the police..i dun wan to sue him liao. Haha..more charges ahead. The victim have no right to stop the prosecution...only the Attorney General. Mr. Green

Honeybunz SG

Yes, the law exists. Why do you think The Chick publication literature are discreetly slotted into letterboxes of Catholic Families instead of giving to the Catholics face to face?

Yes, the churchgoers who parked their car illegal were in the wrong. That's why all the Parishioners of OLPS Church decided not to sue the guy. But the authority has stated that this is a criminal law and there is nothing that the victim could do.

I am amazed to see that the Catholics from OLPS were, throughout the whole time, being impartial and fair about this whole thing. They agreed that the car owner was selfish and at fault. They felt that the guy who disrupted the church service should not be sued.

I am sure Jesus, During the Lord Supper, will take pride in them -- The Roman Catholics of course Smile .

laurence82 SG

Eh, what is a Chick publication?

SingaporeMacross SG

It is a series of anti-Catholic tracts with cartoons in it. It was written by a man named Jack Chick. Not much is known about him. You are advised not to read them, because they are full of lies. Examples include:

http://www.catholic.com/library/sr_chick_tracts_p1.asp

A total load of rubbish from a man who does not know anything about the Catholic Church.

« Previous Page