I read with sadness the passing of Private Lee Rui Feng
Dominique. I am also an NSF having seven months left to complete my
national service. My view is that such deaths can definitely be
prevented. I feel that the medical board in the Singapore Armed
Forces (SAF) does not take the health and welfare of soldiers
seriously. Sometimes, when soldiers report sick, they can even be
reprimanded by the medical officer (MO). It is also common for the
MO to simply prescribe painkillers without ordering further
investigations such as X-RAYS or MRI scans. This is not the way
that the SAF should operate.
It should take the health of its soldiers much more seriously. If
PTE Lee had a asthma condition, why was he still declared combat
fit? Let those who are medically well serve as combat soldiers. For
those who have medical conditions, they should be downgraded to an
appropriate Physical Employment Status (PES). I feel that medical
board in SAF is too strict with their PES grading and often tries
to give servicemen the highest grading possible, instead of the
safest or most appropriate one. For myself, I have both serious
heart conditions as well as asthma which require me to use inhalers
multiple times a day. However, I am not being assigned an
appropriate PES status by the medical board. I can only imagine how
the parents of PTE Lee are feeling.
It is not easy to bring up a child from birth, through primary and
secondary school, pre-university education and then national
service, only to see them lose their life in NS. Every Singaporean
Son’s life is precious. Although I may not know the full details of
the case, I feel that commanders’ attitude towards soldiers also
need to change. Some commanders tend to instil fear into their
charges from reporting sick, threatening to punish them with
weekend duties and confinement. As a result, even when the soldiers
feel terrible and ought to seek medical attention, they tolerate
and bear with the pain and discomfort. If attitudes do not change,
I believe that we will continue to see more deaths of servicemen in
our armed forces. MINDEF should also look into the way its training
is being conducted, as sometimes the commanders do not follow the
training program and ask the soldiers to do more than they are
supposed to. Commanders need to understand that soldiers are only
human and are not robots. They have physical limits, which if
pushed too far, may result in permanent injury or even death. There
is a large opportunity cost to our NSFs to serve two years of
national service. They lose out in terms of tertiary education, job
experience, freedom and family time.
I salute all current serving national servicemen as those who have
served since the beginning of national service. PTE Lee is a hero,
having died for Singapore. But more should be done to review the
safety procedures in place, the safety of the equipment used, the
quality of food served to our soldiers, as well as the medical
classification system, so that such events will not happen
again.
Yes, perhaps people might say that the soldiers today are weaker
compared to those in the 70s, 80s and 90s. Some even call us the
strawberry generation. However, these are different times. People
in the past led less sedentary lifestyles. However, the system
should adjust to fit the people and not the other way around.
Training can be tweaked to take into account that the soldiers of
today are physically and mentally different from soliders of the
past.
In addition, I feel that the duration of national service should be
revised as NCMP Mrs Lina Chiam has suggested. Yes, I understand
that there are operational requirements and that it is important to
ensure that the soldiers are sufficiently well trained. I feel that
it is possible to reduce the duration of national service to 22
months for officers and 18 months for specialists and enlistees.
Especially for NSFs who are serving in service support vocations
such as medic, storeman, clerk. Most of the time, we are not doing
much or anything productive in unit and are just wasting time,
waiting for Operationally Ready Date (ORD).
It is not necesarry to waste resources to pay us and feed us to do
nothing when we could better spend this time studying or working to
earn a living outside. I am sure many NSFs who have ORDed will have
experienced what it is like to be behind others in terms of jobs,
promotions, salary, experience, etc. And with the influx of
foreigners coming to Singapore to compete for jobs, we should be
placed at a lesser disadvantage so that we are better able to
compete in the workplace.
Also, the reservist cycle of NS men should be reduced to 8 cycles.
The number of days a year that NS men can be called back should be
reduced from 40 days to 28 days. Training should be efficient,
short and concise. What sense does it make to call reservists back
to camp and pay them to sit in bunks to do nothing? I am sure many
NS men dread the SAF 100 as it disrupts their work. Many bosses
would probably prefer to give priority and favour to the foreign
talents who do not have any reservist liability. Singaporean men
who work in the private sector do not enjoy higher salary for
having served NS. The least the goverment could do is to minimise
the inconvenience and disadvantage caused to them. Last but not
least, I feel that more benefits should be given to all who have
served or are currently serving national service. The National
Service Recognition Award (NSRA) introduced in 2010 consisted of
$9000 paid out over three milestones. 1. $3000 into Post Secondary
Eduction Account (PSEA) at 20th month of NSF, 2. $3000 into CPF
After 3 high key ICT or 5 ICT, 3. $3000 into CPF upon completion of
ORNS cycle. There is also the $3000 tax relief given to NS
men.
However, I feel that these measures are not enough. More can be
done to show the government's appreciation towards us who have
served the country.
1. ORD Bonus: NSFs will get paid $2000 upon completion of their
full time NS
2. ICT Bonus: NS men will get paid $2000 upon completion of that
year's ICT.
3. ROD Bonus: NS men will get $4000.
Those who have RODed should also be given the awards. I am sure
that the government is able to afford it. There are a lot of issues
bugging Singaporeans now. Issues such as competition from foreign
talent, housing, inflation, income inequality, immigration, just to
name a few.
The PAP promised us change in the last election. But it seems that
after being voted into power, they have forgotten their promises
and obligations. Now, they just sit on their bums and are not doing
their best to improve the various aspects of life of Singaporeans.
I feel that if this continues on, more and more Singaporeans will
develop a resentment towards the goverment. And when the next
elections come, I am sure that the results will be different from
the previous ones. But for the next few years, the 40% minority
have to suffer due to the decision of the other 60%. Can the
government please, wake up your idea?