The recent NDP, contract could be given to a bus co tat does not
have enough buses resulting in a sub contract to 3rd party to
execute
No doubt such schemes do get e best out of e population to
become policy or doctrine planners, but it does not help if the
selection process dun adapt with times 
what does this mean? maybe you can clarify as i could not
understand your 'level' of english ie what you meant to say in the
NDP thing. It is quite unintelligible.
You need to back up the selection process bit. it's a fine and
the same set of barometers the powers that be work with for almost
40 yrs and is applied to not only the SAF but throughout the whole
civil service.
Whoever's in charge of the 'buses', hahahaha in the NDP is not
the chairman. Maybe you want to blame the useless people under him
who somehow get promoted because of leaks - somehow if you stay
long enough in any place, you get bumped up by default though at a
lower rate than talented people. This is as prevalent in the
private sector as it is in the public sector and is a fact of the
world. The CEP system prevents such people from wreaking damage
beyond their core incompetencies, while factoring the default
ascension they get, acting as an effective ceiling ie shit
plug.
It takes an irredeemably naive person to attribute the 'buses'
at one NDP, I really can't think of anything more banal, to a
larger system so complex and beyond his imaginable payscale and
talk about its 'selection criteria' 