As a current NSF, all I cay say is the range of NSFs out there
are varying. There's no point attempting to draw a correlation
between NS and behavioural changes that may occur due to other
factors, not only due to NS alone.
No, I am not defending NS, but it's downright unfair to
sweepingly generalise the entire population based on a few
examples. Just put it this way, you wouldn't want people to label
Singapore as a nation of robbers if he/she is just unforunate
enough to be robbed twice.
There are various types of NSFs out there. Those who never grow
up, those who remain bitchy, those who just wayang, those who
relac-jack, those who happy-go-lucky, those who siam arrows, those
who let their not-very-high ranks go to their head, those who know
how to take care of their subordinates and colleagues, those who do
anything to climb etc etc.
A chinese saying goes, a single type of rice can produce 100
types of people. I believe NS is no different.
politically correct answer xD....
anyways, its more of a matter of how easy a person is to hold on
to his own beliefs n principles or how easy a person gets swayed by
opinions n behaviours of others. humans naturally need each other n
influence each other as we r social beings. whether we r
strong believers in ourselves, or followers to other's
lead.