Let me tell you this, your views represent nothing unless you'r
part of the Lee clan. No one at the top will change their
decision because you can't get your kicks out of your husband's new
uniform.
There are a million and one other issues to address and well;
the debate over whether the new SAf no. 4 is "fashionable" enough
ain't one of them.
I seriously need to question your husband's motive as to
why he's still married to you in the first place if all you
ever loved about him was his uniform.
nooo i love many things abt him.. he is simply perfect.. but I
really love the uniform.
I am sure the enemies will die laughing when they see the fugly
uniform our soldiers wear. Is this operationally sound?
It's not abt fashionable. Fashionable means it's fleeting and
current. The no.4 is an old classic, it's not
fashionable.
I found this.
http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/mindef_websites/atozlistings/army/microsites/armymuseum/education/stories/Personal_Stories/1970s/Daniel_Chua.html
As COL Chua espoused, when it comes to uniforms today,
comfort must commensurate with sense of identity.
"[It] is important that when we wear it [the uniform],
not only should we feel a sense of belonging but we should feel
proud wearing it, and of course we should feel good wearing it ...
there is a new meaning to all these things. [These] enhance our
identity, and we can feel proud of that. So why
not?"
Interestingly, COL Chua is currently involved with recent
developments in the Army's Number 4 uniform. In the near future,
the camouflage print on the Number 4 uniform will be replaced by
pixelised design.
"From a very simple Temasek Green to the Camouflage Number 4
and now, when we are actually developing 'digitised' uniforms. It
is the future of the battlefield. This is science as well as art.
Science for obvious reasons... we spent dollars to produce that
design of pixels. And it is an art in the sense that whenever we
put on the uniform, it must
look good, it must feel good. At the end of the day we must feel
proud when you're wearing it."