Then your native unit armskote cannot close shop until you go
back. You take car also no use. Must wait for company armskote
cleared then can book out right?
Nope, & I suppose I've better clarify. 21SA operated the SP
mortar then (mounted inside M113s) & I believe it "bao"-ed all
the local Arty live-firing attachments since, obviously, the 155mm
units cannot fire real rounds here. Some SAR units also had the
same weapons but I don't think they had FO teams.
So I could be attached out for various missions. The most frequent
involved live firing, usually 2 days' dry-runs & one day live,
quite rigidly conducted with a lot of controllers in attendence.
But the embedded Arty BTY & FO team would return to our own
unit each night & then move out again next morn. The other
common version was their one-day BN-level EXs (no live rounds), so
again the FO team could head back after the debrief. The hassle
was, rather, ensuring our indented Land Rover knew where to find
us! ~lol~ In both instances, must sent arms after each RTU.
Yes, there were times when we didn't return for a few days but it
only involved the forward teams (2-3 soldiers) &, I guess, the
DOs would clear arms accordingly once they saw the absent personnel
included officers (either the FSO who's also the BTY commander, or
the FO).
Travel by car was quite uncomfortable, I tell you ~lol~ It was a
more innocent time then, but still an amazing feeling whenever we
could clear the guardroom (with rifles & signal sets in the car
boot). Thankfully, we did it only once or twice, sticking more with
the Land Rover option. Also, outfield FSO attachments were quite
few; most of them had involved wargamings instead (no combat
gear).
I think this FSO system is very silly.
Yeah, I questioned it too, vis-a-via how the FOs operated in
Vietnam. Furthermore, IMO it's impracticable that the Arty units
shall fire at the BN level (18 mortars or 12 guns) in wartime, as
per training. (In Vietnam, they fired at the BTY level via forward
bases). Then, after my ORD, I saw how the Arty elements were
co-opted into the combat-arms DIVs during the Army restructurings
& wondered if the SAF bureaucrats had overdid themselves. But
~shrug~ they're professionals, & Lee Hsien Loong was also an
ex-gunner, so hopefully they know what they're doing.
Why can't combat units have their own FSOs under Battalion HQ or
Support Company?
IMO Cuz they're historically combat support & not combat
arms, in our context. Ditto the ADA BNs, which some other armed
forces notably view as more frontline. In any case, the SIR units
have their own mortar platoons for heavier fire support, more
significantly on an ad-hoc basis too cuz the rear Arty guns need to
be properly coordinated & climatic conditions factored
in.
Why can't combat units have their own FSOs under Battalion HQ or
Support Company?
According to my "heirs" at the recent AOH, the unit no longer
has FOs. (Cuz the SSSH Primus is 155mm, presumably.) So maybe
they're now fully under infantry strength, or perhaps with SAR
outfits & their ATTC Broncos. Neither make operational sense
though, since the FOs won't get live training on the one hand,
& armoured troops are too frontline to support the infantry on
the other.
Okay, back to topic ....