The people to pity in the case are the 2 superior officers whom
our celeb. officer has complained to the about that officer going
AWOL. Now tio condemned...henta kaki cepat henta already. Good
Game...
Huh? Those two are the morons who looked the other way when
there was a serial AWOL officer in their unit. They're lucky to get
only warning letters! Talk about the SAF taking care of its
own...
I think need to clarify something here, his punishment was
"reprimand". This is different from the scolding that it normally
means. A reprimand in military law terms is a defined punishment
more serious than your normal extras. It is recorded and will
affect military careers.
Good point &, to keep the reprimand in context, the
consequence of Li's action (reporting misconduct) will override his
intention (honorable or not) as well as the punishment itself. He
can always claim this, whenever asked what happened.
*Muses* Tough to judge whistleblowing acts, something that can
never be unambiguous -- partly why I think the Govt hesitates in
enacting any "blanket" protection law. Opinions about them are
often irreconcilable, depending on one's prejudice. The chatter
here & elsewhere reflect so: Li is either a selfless martyr
(hero), or a selfish backstabber (no comeuppence).
The SAF better learn from this. Stressing COC is one thing but,
with the Internet influence nowadays, external whistleblowing
cannot be managed like before (a REC complaining to his Tekong OO,
or a PTE to his constituency MP). The fallout over the Commando/Hu
Enhuai case already bore witness.
so wat? in e end he still got away wif a verbal warning only...
i tink he deserved to b punished more...
For contravening MINDEF General Orders, it's hard to say. Those
regulations are restricted info, we dunno what the exact charge
was, & what its recommended punishment is.
Still think Li should've been indicted for improper handover of
duty. (Maybe he was, but it wasn't reported. Can any lurkers from
the SIG BN confirm?) Discussed this with my brother last nite over
family dinner. Although a RSAF LTC, he's got experience as a camp
commandant so I don't believe he was BS-ing me. Based on the email
details, his view was that any AWOL charge wouldn't have stick on
Li, & which the SAF must've concurred post-investigations.
Ditto any on the duty BOS or equivalent (if there was one), since
there was different witnesses vouching that LTA X deceived them
about being physically inside the camp.
He saw my point about improper handover, though, but didn't think
Li's offense was court martial-able like LTA X's was. To him, a
summary trial was adequate, as long as the presiding disciplinary
officer is 2 ranks higher. Detention or demotion was too harsh, but
one of the more minor penalties (fine, reprimand or extra duties)
would've suffice.
But Li wasn't hauled up on any such charge. The SAF disciplined him
for broadcasting his complaint to non-relevant personnel
instead.
would the PSC/Admin Service give 2 hoots? ....would MIT care
about his military record?
Note, all he said was "affect military careers". But to respond:
Yes, the PSC shall care since Li's on their scholarship; I expect
them to review his case unfavorably, but only to put him on
probation or something. (Get real, people, a white horse like him
still kena charged already.) No, outside entities like MIT won't
care, or even know, if there was no media publicity. Only those in
sensitive industries like aeroplane, maritime or security, etc.
need to conduct such background checks; otherwise it's per what you
declare on your resume (& suffer any consequences
accordingly).