Interesting you should mention this, because in war would a
military commander care about the enemy? Having info could save his
men or other fellow soldiers' lives. What's more how would a
commander know if the enemy is not doing the same to POWs?
I had a similar interesting discussion with WOs once when I was in
Army... and many people feel when you're at the point in time... to
hell with the Geneva Code and what not, the lives of the men you
lead are at stake.
lemme paint you this scenario, based on a movie about the 70's
US-Viet COng War.
An American team split up along a mangrove, each led by a 2Lt. One
group got ambushed and was under heavy fire. The other american
group managed to capture the OC and runner of the VietCong unit. Do
note the OC and runner surrendered, making them POWs
Hearing the gun fire from a distance, the 2Lt knows the OC can call
off the ambush and save his other team. So he threatens the OC with
a gun. The OC refused, and the 2LT killed the runner in cold
blood.
Although the other team was brutally massacred... should the 2Lt
have killed the runner, given the OC and runner both surrendered
and were by the Geneva Code -POWs and to be free of all mil
torture.