K, though you do have a point, i am not trying to be biased. Not
wanting to sound aggresive, I just want to say that why some of the
"better" treatment they get are warranted.
I am not arguing between NSF or Regulars and they should accept
certain risk because they volunteered.
This is what i meant...
e.g. Girls skip the "gate", guys clear the "gate" with SBO.
i am not the MO nor was I the G6 guy who said girls can skip the
"gate", but this is my understanding....
lets say guy clears the gate with SBO PROPERLY according to
prescribed methods... he does it many times, or countless times
PROPERLY. No long term harm can happen to him.
but in the case of girls, they do so the PROPER way (assuming the
"guy's method), they do as much time as the guy did. Even though
how proper, they will sustain injury due to the fact that their
bodies are different and can handle less stress.
Even if they can handle less stress, it is not recommended to be
subjected to stress as some point in their life they will need to
bear children. It will be an unfortunate event if she encounter
complications during the pregnancy or worse fracture her pelvis
while giving birth.
I hope you see the point i am trying to put across.
In my opinion, females can actually do SOC with SBO, i just think
that SAF don't want to be liable for anything.