this case a bit complex... I was reading the TIME magazine
article. Apparently, there are one or 2 soldiers under him that had
a grudge and the prosecutors are relying mainly on their testimony
against him. One of them is the platoon sgt.
Also, from the initial forensics, the victims were shot in the
back, so they appeared to be running away and not threatening him,
as he had said.
He is a strange gung-ho type guy, which does not help his case...
was an investment banker in NYC, and then volunteered. I think the
prosecution will build a case that this was an "over-zealous" chap
and was a trigger happy chap. Likely to be 2nd degree manslaughter,
if he is not careful in his defense.
