1) why muz declare got tattoo? wat diff does it make?
I think it's part of the larger governmental SOP; they ask these
questions when arrested or applying for a civil-service job too.
The most obvious rationale is about image, since it's usually
phrased as "what design & where is the tattoo?" - so the post
about SAF Provost exclusion seems logical. They may screen your
background if the design has other connotations beyond pure vanity,
given S'pore past history with secret societies.
2) is having a tattoo gonna affect his army life? will he be
barred from sispec, ocs or any other courses?
I can vouch for the mono-intake: no. Had one guy directly under
my charge - the full "lang zi ming, shang xin ku" on his back -
& I was wondering what I got myself into cuz he reported with a
gelled-up, super-long yellow mane as well (it was December 1987)
when I picked him up at CMPB. Turned out to be very malleable,
& I recommended retaining him as a mortarman. The irony is my
battery had 2 pai-kia recruits - non-tattooed - & for some
reason they were paired up as buddies. Instead of fireworks, they
bonded relatively well for supposedly secret-society rivals, but
were poorer performers during BMT & were posted out.
3) will he be differentiated from other enlistees w/o
tattoos?
Overall, unlikely, since recruits are recruits. The other
trainees & the DI's may be curious, if not wary, of his
background if the tattoo is more insidious, but that's all. It's
still the usual suspects whenever a serviceman stands out
negatively: the Blur king, Gabra king, Keng king, Sabo king,
Tuang/Skive/Snake king, Idle king, Koon King, YaYa king, MC king,
BoBo/WoWo shooter, Zero fighter (chin-ups), Topo general,
One-Stripe/Two-Stripe/Three-Stripe general (YaYa LCP/CPL/SGT
respectively), etc. In other words, "performance"-based.