Liverpool forced twice as many corners as the home side – not a
guaranteed indicator of dominance in a match, but a reasonable
one.
Attempts on goal? Liverpool 15 Portsmouth 9. On target? Again in
Liverpool’s favour. Possession? Comfortably Liverpool’s.
Clearly this was no smash and grab raid, regardless of the
lateness of the strikes.
So why the negativity?
It appears to have become a growing trend this season – from
people with entrenched views and mindsets.
Every time Liverpool concede a goal from a set piece, it’s
because of zonal marking, and analysis instantly begins of
Liverpool’s defensive frailties.
Yet zonal marking has been in place at Anfield for four years –
and Pepe Reina has won the Premier League’s Golden Gloves award in
three of them.
Then there’s the attacking focus.
Saturday night’s TV analysis focused on the number of times
Liverpool’s strikers spent outside the penalty area.
The same attacking system which scored three goals and has
outscored Manchester United this season.
Imagine the reaction if Liverpool had just won eight of their
last 11 matches 1-0.
It wouldn’t be a celebration of goalkeeping excellence, it would
more likely be how Benitez was boring his way to the title.
There is no doubt that the political in-fighting, the ill-timed
outbursts and the bizarre transfer policy have made criticising
Liverpool the journalistic equivalent of shooting fish in a barrel
this season.
But this time, at least, the critics have missed the target.
i tend to agree