Sorry I would love to address this in parts.
Originally posted by laurence82:
Yes, outsiders shouldnt interfere, esp those who are not affected
and just wanna join in the mudslinging. This goes out too for non
participants who just came and sit one corner, who do not have the
capability to be able to observe any participant of the BBQ, and
thus is not on receiving end of any praises, insults or
actions.
Thus, my question,
are you a victim or just another mudslinger?
Originally posted by laurence82:
If u want to talk about legislating one behaviour around here, be
mindful everyone is doing it here. I see no exception. It include
people who think they have to come back from their hibernation
everytime they see what they perceive as as 'stupid threads',
acting like a forum guardian, intervening in matters remotely
related to them, which are being settled by affected people thru
the proper and better channels.
No, I just come back
from hibernation to watch forums progression into the new year. I
don't think it's nice to come back and see people throwing stones
at each other, especially when the year is ending, when we're
supposed to forgive and forget the past and move on. Of course,
you're still entitled to continue your actions, but I see the
repeated attacking of someone over different threads is uncounted
for. And I will like to remind those who think it's fun and knew it
is wrong when you don't have a sensible reason for persistent
attacks that they are going overboard with their mindless
actions.
Originally posted by laurence82:
Regarding 'knocking sense into someone', no point pointing out its
useless trying to knock sense into ceecookie, while in the other
thread, told ceecookie directly he has to 'go up one notch on his
sensitivity level', with regards to the tsunami victim thread. Its
very ironic when i see one do this.
Of course, if they
are biting into his actions there I have no qualms, please check
reference urls for information.
Originally posted by laurence82:
After the thread on Xmas day, no else has pursue the matter
anymore. Its a one time off thread.
I beg to differ, the
reference was still in those urls. You're not involved but I do not
see any reasons in that particular thread as a base for attacks
unless its personnal and those found inside the mentioned thread
does not seem to have a concrete basis for their unneccessary
attacks even though he was being blunt and stupid. Do you not make
stupid comments or blunt remarks?
Originally posted by laurence82:
Put it in this perspective. U can try to be supportive and
campaigning for ceecookie all u want. U can keep potraying him as
weak, helpless, defenceless guy being pounced upon by many others.
Go ahead. The problem no longer lies in 'others' but 'him'
onli.
I do not think he's
weak, nor helpless, nor defenceless. Nor do I support his actions,
the problem lies in the behavior of the rest. It's the actions of
others I'm discussing. And the key problem I'm highlighting is
those who shouldn't be mudslinging for fun.
Originally posted by laurence82:
Already those who spoke their piece, said it, in a final tone. If
any of the affected still continues it, its one problem. But how
about a continuation, a flow of other people keep coming in to
point out his crappy posts towards others, as seen in the thread
the topic starter linked to, the one on Americans? There is no
guarantee of his safety in sgforums. A continual flow of new people
coming in to point out his insensitivity..
So are you a good
judge of your own actions, laurence82, when you constantly do poke
fun at others? I don't think so that you're more sensitive in
certain ways. Let me fix this at it. We're not sensitive at times,
but his actions now does not equate to a necessary ban. If he
should be banned, then SBSK, 5 times over, you and I ten times
over.
Originally posted by laurence82:
so how? The campaign is successful until and unless fireice finds
it absolutely necessary to press the ban button. Hope ur campaign
will not mislead him to think his actions is a ok, and result in a
ban or something.
I did not see in any
way someone's biased opinion nor poor interpretation of anything =
ban.
Originally posted by laurence82:
Thats all i wanna say. Good luck.
Here's my opinion of the entire situation. No direct offence to
anyone, but my biased, selfish opinion. 
