1 of my friend sms a girl asking her for sex and that he is
willing to pay. She make a police report for outrage of
molesty.
After my friend went down to make a statement, 9 months later
the police contact him to close the case.
The police give him a conditional warning that he is not allowed
to commit any crime in the next 12 months or else they will charge
him in court for the new case plus this outrage of molesty
case.
It is the Chief Investigating Officer who issue the conditional
warning. He seems to be a big shot in the police force because he
have his own office and my friend saw alot of other police officers
bringing in people to his office for him to give them warning.
My friend find this conditional warning to be very bullshit.
Because it should be AGO who issue him the warning and not a what
Chief Investigating Officer. The Chief Investigating Officer does
not have the authority to issue a warning. Only AGO and the judge
can give warning.
Moreover, my friend did not have any criminal offence in the
past too. This is his 1st case with the police.
Is the Chief Investigating Officer abusing his authority to give
unauthorised warning letters?
Your friend already committed an offence and he still thinks he
deserved to be treated fairly?
Can you ask him DID HE ALSO TREATED HIS VICTIM(THAT GIRL)
FAIRLY?
If the answer is YES, then come and tell me and I'll go
represent your friend for FREE.
Don't give me excuses like this is the first time your friend is
committing an offence. Why don't you tell me this is the first time
your friend is being CAUGHT for committing an offence?
Criminals and non-criminals alike, nowadays people think they
are overly-educated and imagined they can get away with everything
with their excuses.
Who asked your friend to go commit an offence? If he
is brave enough to gamble with the law and commit an
offence, then he should also be brave enough to accept his
punishment.
Is he still a guy? Please ask him to go cut off his ku
ku bird ok? Maybe then the judge will be lenient towards him.
