Qing dynasty girls better wives?

Twilight SG SG

To this day, I;m wondering if the divorce rate and low birth rate due to westernization of chinese women...it will be nice to go back to chinese classics and bring back some real love..that way no need for foreign wives input

ditzy SG

You go try then tell us.

FireIce SG

y Qing?

and not Qin? or Han? or Wei? or Jin? or Tang? or Song? or Yuan? or Ming?

Twilight SG SG

Last dynasty before westernisation of politics and education..and besides who knows what will china be if the dynasty is kept intact with other reforms?

FireIce SG

last time no politics and education???????????

then i wondered y we got Qin..........................

Twilight SG SG

At least the south able to use dialects more freedom it seems during Qing dynasty

步步驚心

troublemaker2005 SG

mainland cheena women are sluts.

they husbands are cheap labors.]

EPeriod

SG.AdultsCircle.com SG

I got a time machine for sale.

Summer hill SG

Yes, TS, please go back to Qing Dynasty and not come into modern Singapore

FireIce SG

byebye!

SJS6638 SG

TS, mo ming qi miao!

Francesco Toldo SG

that era people busy with "fan qing fu ming".

Twilight SG SG

Maybe qiongyao tend to romantise Qing dynasty undying love

kengkia SG

TS, in order to have qing dynasty women, u need to use a time machine to get back. oh before that, u must make your hair into a quque.....

Twilight SG SG

The point I'm trying to make is unless china can rediscover her cultural heritage and remake them great like japan..she can never be be a real power despite her wealth..Qing dynasty is the last gasp of china cultural development and not totally chinese with manchurian influences...

The women in china now is somehow worse than Qing dynasty..so if the women of a nation reflect her cultural strength...I'm not seeing any ..I find Japan retain the best of chinese influences and refined them to a higher level

FireIce SG

no link.

at all.

Dalforce 1941 SG

The point I'm trying to make is unless china can rediscover her cultural heritage and remake them great like japan..she can never be be a real power despite her wealth..

But now China is the rising power and Japan is the declining power.

Lukashenko: 21st century will belong to China

MINSK, 15 January (BelTA) – The current century will belong to China, President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko told the press conference for Belarusian and foreign media.

Asked about the role of China in the international arena, Alexander Lukashenko called China a major power in the world. “It is good that now we have such a state that will put an end, or already doing it, to the unipolarity of the world. It is a great thing, because the world will not survive long being unipolar,” said Alexander Lukashenko.

Speaking about the cooperation between Belarus and China, the President said that it has been increasingly vibrant in recent years. “We are opening joint production facilities there. The People's Republic of China is creating new plants here. We welcome these projects and help our Chinese partners in every possible way,” he said. Alexander Lukashenko assured that Belarus is China’s reliable ally. "If you (representatives of China – note by BelTA) want to develop cooperation with other states including the European Union from the territory of Belarus, you can count on us,” added the President.

http://news.belta.by/en/news/president?id=704113

SINGAPORE - Western nations have failed to capitalise on China's economic rise as they struggle with their own problems, leaving others to benefit from the Asian giant's insatiable demand, HSBC said Tuesday.

"The world economy is increasingly led by China. Those nations raising their China exposure have outperformed. Western nations, faced with internal discord, have failed to grab the opportunity," the bank said.

"We are rapidly moving away from an 'old world' dominated by Europe, the US and Japan to a 'new world' led by China," it said in a report entitled "The Great Rotation".

Among the beneficiaries of the global shift are countries located close to China and far-flung exporters that supply the Asian giant's demand for commodities, the report noted...

http://news.asiaone.com/A1Business/News/Story/A1Story20130115-395735.html

Dalforce 1941 SG

Revival of China’s civilization gives legitimacy to its rise

By Wang Yiwei

In recent years, the troubles China has met in terms of its diplomacy seem to come from the US' high-profile pivot to Asia and the fact that neighboring countries have not adapted to China's rise. However, the real reason comes from their doubts about China's rise.

Why should China rise? How can China rise? Even the Chinese people have not pondered over these fundamental questions.

I got four answers when I asked my students. Some responded by saying that China is seeking to regain the prosperity that it had in history. In 1820, China's GDP made up 32.4 percent of the world's total, while it only takes up 10 percent now.

Then I asked, if China's GDP takes up one-third of the world's total, what will give legitimacy to China's further rise? And how does one measure China's rejuvenation? If we have to look back to the Han Dynasty (206BC-220AD) or the Tang Dynasty (618-907) when China's development was at its peak, should we resume the imperial tribute system? Will China's neighboring countries allow that to happen? The students had nothing to say.

Others said China's rise means surpassing the US, as China has no reason to endure the US being the world's No.1.

I asked, if in the near future, China's GDP exceeds that of the US, should China continue to develop? Will China's GDP per capita reach the US level? Even if this is the case, what about the environment, housing and healthcare system? The world cannot afford to have another US. In addition, China is an inland country and its traditional development mode is farming-oriented. Can it replace the US hegemony? The students failed to respond.

The third answer was that development is China's right as its GDP per capita only ranks 90th in the world.

However, should China continue its development if China's GDP per capita reaches the world's average level? What will be its next aim?

The final answer I got is that China is aiming to build a harmonious world that boosts long-term peace and joint prosperity, and a world led by the West is unfair and unsustainable.

I asked, are Russia and India not developing peacefully? Isn't Iran also aiming to build a harmonious world? What level of development should China reach so as to help the world achieve harmony?

Since the First Opium War (1840-42), the interaction between China and the world has gone through three stages.

In the first stage, China was forced to merge with the world. Then it actively opened its doors to the world. Now it is at the third stage, when China and the world are influencing and adapting to each other. This is the most important part, as the West needs to be rebuilt and China should rethink its identity.

From my perspective, discovering the universal values embedded in traditional Chinese civilization and allowing the country to integrate into the world is the mission of China's rise.

In fact, China's system and values are increasingly moving toward universal characteristics. The new international economic order proposed by China after the financial crisis has some universal values.

China's way of handling climate change also shows the Chinese people's energy-saving and emission-reducing lifestyle and their concept of the harmonious development between man and nature. The China model is enriching the notion of universal values.

Reviewing other countries' rise in modern history, it came either from a power shift within the West itself or competition aimed at Westernization. It is China's rise that transcends these historical modes.

The rise of China as a civilized country is its biggest advantage in terms of identity. It is incongruous to explain the legitimacy of China's rule in the context of Western-style democracy and human rights. It is also wrong to explain China's strategy of peaceful rise by using the so-called international relations theory.

The socialist path with Chinese characteristics, in terms of China's internal development, is the revival of Chinese civilization. It is also a great creation in the history of human civilization and an experiment in the ruling of a country in the era of globalization. This is where the legitimacy of China's rise lies.

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/756033.shtml

SJS6638 SG

But now China is the rising power and Japan is the declining power.

Lukashenko: 21st century will belong to China

http://news.belta.by/en/news/president?id=704113

"We are rapidly moving away from an 'old world' dominated by Europe, the US and Japan to a 'new world' led by China," it said in a report entitled "The Great Rotation".

Among the beneficiaries of the global shift are countries located close to China and far-flung exporters that supply the Asian giant's demand for commodities, the report noted...

http://news.asiaone.com/A1Business/News/Story/A1Story20130115-395735.html

Confirmed that you are a helicopter.

ter ted terd terd.

Post in Chinese la , why post in the English language which is your most hated language. YOU ARE THE BIGGEST HYPOCRITE IN SGF.

YOU ARE JUST NOTHING JUST AN ARSE LIKE YOUR BELOVED LKY.

Dalforce 1941 SG

Huan Hsiang’s theory is correct.

The Western World is disintegrating.

Currently it is in the process of breaking up, though not yet completely. But is heading in that direction. Final disintegration is inevitable.

The transitional period may last quite a while; it will not happen overnight.

The so-called Western unity is an empty term. There is unity; Dulles is striving for it, but it has to be under U.S. control.

Under the atomic bomb, the big and small partners must rally around the U.S., pay tribute, and prostrate themselves as inferiors. This is the so-called unity of the Americans.

Such a situation will inevitably head toward the opposite of unity, to disintegration.

Comrades, under today’s situation, to whom does the world belong?!

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-8/mswv8_18.htm