January 14, 2010
The Straits Times reported today of a 26 year old Myanmar
national Yin Yin Oo signed up for free English classes at a
Community Club because she needed “help” in spoken English.
She has been working in Singapore as an “accounts executive” for
over a year.
While it is not revealed what she does exactly, it is highly
unlikely that she is a professional accountant by training when she
admits that “she was at the ‘intermediate’ level in reading and
writing”.
In all likelihood, Ms Yin is probably doing some simple
book-keeping at a local SME which employed her due to lower wage
demands.
With due respect to Ms Yin, her job can be easily taken over by
any Singaporean with a ITE or “O” level certificate.
The ruling party has been defending its “foreign talent” policy
on the ground that foreigners are needed to fill vacancies in
certain sectors shunned by locals such as construction, nursing and
IT support services.
However, in the past few years, we have seen an increasing
number of foreigners on S-passes (S for semi-skilled) flocking to
work in Singapore.
These semi-skilled foreign workers compete directly with
Singaporeans for jobs which otherwise belong to them such as
nursery school teachers, administrators, clinic assistants, IT
engineers and “accounts executives”.
They are in high demand due to their lower wages which help to
raise the profit margins of small businesses.
A PRC nursery school teacher commands a monthly salary of only
$1,200 to $1,400 compared to Singaporean who fetches more than
$2,000.
Given a choice, any employer will hire the cheaper PRC and save
$800 – $1,000 in wages monthly.
It is impossible for local workers to compete with these
so-called “foreign talents.” A PRC living alone in Singapore can
survive with that kind of salary, but what about a Singaporean with
a family to feed?
The question is: why are these PRCs allowed to work in Singapore
at all when their qualifications are a suspect in the first place?
(like the infamous Zhang Yuanyuan who came to Singapore armed with
a diploma from an unknown institution in China; she got her PR
within 2 months of application)
The Manpower Ministry should release more information on the
number of foreign workers in Singapore on S-passes, their
occupations as well as the percentage who are granted Singapore PRs
to enable Singaporeans to better assess if these foreigners are
indeed “talents” or “thrash”.
A recent article by Wall Street Journal suggested that the
influx of foreigners into Singapore in the last few years has led
directly to the stagnation of wages of blue-collar workers,
widening of the income gap between the rich and the poor, overall
decrease in labor productivity and standards of living. (read
article
here)
Singapore companies must start thinking of ways to boost their
productivity and reduce their over-dependence on foreign
workers.
Ms Yin will probably not be able to find work in any other first
world country with the exception of Singapore.
More stringent criteria should be put in place so that we only
recruit foreigners in selected sectors which genuinely face
manpower shortage due to difficulties in employing locals.
DISCLAIMER:
Mingalaba! We are not against any race or nationality. The
gist of the article is simply to highlight the ruling party’s lax
immigration guidelines in allowing too many foreigners on S-passes
to work in Singapore when their jobs can easily be taken over by
locals. To be fair, Burmese are generally quite hardworking, honest
and genial by nature compared to some others. For those of us who
have been to Burma, you will agree that Burmese are among the most
hospitable people in the world. We apologize if you we have hurt
the feelings of our fellow Burmese friends in anyway.
Khay-zu-din-ba-leh!
http://www.temasekreview.com/2010/01/14/myanmar-national-with-poor-command-of-english-working-as-accounts-executive-in-singapore/comment-page-12/#comment-57177
January 14, 2010
Foreigners, PRs and new citizens are flocking to free
language classes organized by Community Clubs sponsored generously
by Singapore taxpayers to help them “integrate” into Singapore
society.
In 2008, foreigners, permanent residents and new citizens made
up 55 per cent of participants in English classes and 47 per cent
in the Chinese ones, a People’s Association (PA) spokesman
said.
Minister for Youth Development, Community and Sports Dr Vivian
Balakrishnan unveiled a $10-million Community Integration Fund in
October last year to make new immigrants and PR feel “welcomed” and
“happy” in Singapore.
The fund will be used to organize events for the newcomers as
well as to provide free language classes for those who are unable
to speak English and has already been tapped on by various
grassroots organizations including a Residents’ Committee in Yew
Tee, to hold free weekly conversational English lessons for new
immigrants from China, Myanmar and Vietnam.
The Straits Times reported a Myanmar national Yin Yin Oo, 26,
who has been an accounts executive in Singapore for more than a
year, saying that she was at the ‘intermediate’ level in
reading and writing, but needed help with spoken English, so she
signed up for the classes at the community club.
It is not known how she managed to get a job in Singapore in the
first place if she needs “help” with spoken English as there are
more than qualified Singaporeans around to be “account
executives”.
Unlike other countries like Australia and Canada which require
prospective immigrants to pass an English proficiency test before
they are even allowed to work there, Singapore has no such
rules.
Due to the ruling party’s lax criteria for immigrants, even
English iliterate PRC construction workers, masseurs and cleaners
are given Singapore PRs and citizenships.
According to a Wall Street Journal article on 13 January 2010,
the relentless influx of foreign workers ”has kept local
blue-collar wages lower than they would be otherwise, exacerbating
Singapore’s gap between rich and poor.”
Singapore has the highest income-gap among the thirty most
developed countries in the world. Though it is the second richest
nation in Asia after Japan, its citizens have a low domestic
purchasing power comparable to other first world countries. (read
UBS report
here)
A recent report by the International Labor Organization
revealed that Singaporeans work the longest hours among Asian
countries, more than the Japanese, Koreans and Taiwanese, but are
paid less than them.
The median monthly pay of an average Singaporean worker is only
$2,600 compared to $180,000 for a Singapore minister. It has hardly
increased over the lat decade.
Singapore’s octogenarian strongman Lee Kuan Yew dismissed the
importance of the widening income gap at a ministerial forum last
year on the grounds that it “matters little” so long the government
continues to create jobs for Singaporeans.
Despite the increased competition faced by Singaporeans from
foreigners in every sphere of life, the ruling party does not
appear to care much as long as Singapore’s economy continues to
grow. (A substantial portion of the PAP ministers’ multi-million
pay package is pegged to Singapore’s GDP growth).
In a recent interview with National Geographic magazine, Lee
said it is a “good idea” that Singapore has welcomed so many
Chinese immigrants as they are more “hard-driving” and
“hard-striving” than the locals.
“If native Singaporeans are
falling behind because “the spurs are not stuck into the hide,”
that is their problem,” he was quoted as saying in the article
“The Singapore Solution.” by Mark
Jacobson.
[Source:
National Geographic]
http://www.temasekreview.com/2010/01/14/english-iliterate-foreigners-flock-to-cc-language-classes-sponsored-by-singapore-taxpayers/