I recently learned from a source that works closely with the
licensed money lending industry that the IPTO (the Singaporean
government agency that regulates and licenses money lenders)
intends to effectively end the practice of legal unsecured lending
to Singaporeans earning less than $30,000 annually via new
regulations which are to become effective June 1, 2012.
The new regulations state that the interest rate charged is to be
capped at 20% “Effective Interest Rate” (“EIR”) and that no other
fees may be charged to the borrower except:
1.) Late payment fees. 2.) Fees for varying the contract at the
borrowers request 3.) Fees for dishonored cheques 4.) Fees for
unsuccessful GIRO deductions 5.) Fees for early redemption of the
loan or early termination of the contract 6.) Fees for legal costs
incurred for the recovery of the loan
In other words, above and beyond 20% “EIR”, no additional money can
be collected unless the borrower fails to honor the terms of the
loan, requests a change to the contract or repays the loan early.
Since the vast majority of borrowers are going to act in their own
self-interest, clearly they will not change the contract or repay
the loan early if it results in anything much more than an
effective rate of 20% “EIR” over the lifetime of the loan except in
very rare cases. Therefore we can conclude that, for all borrowers
that honor the terms of their contract, money lenders will under no
circumstances be able to receive more than 20% “EIR” on those
loans. That leaves deadbeat borrowers who fail to honor the terms
of their contract as the sole source of additional revenue above
and beyond the 20% “EIR” on loans available to licensed money
lenders. The problem with this, as anyone that has worked in the
industry surely knows, is that once a borrower (particularly in the
short-term, unsecured, subprime market) becomes delinquent in their
payments, chances become significant that some or all of the
principal will never be recovered, let alone the interest and any
additional fees assessed for delinquency. The amount of additional
revenue realized from various types of dishonor fees that are
willingly repaid by delinquent borrowers will not even begin to
cover the losses of those that fail to repay some or all of their
principal.
To illustrate exactly how absurd a 20% “EIR” cap is on these types
of loans let’s take a very simplified hypothetical example: A
licensed money lender makes ten 3-month loans of $1,000 each at 20%
interest p.a. “EIR” stated as specified by the IPTO with three
equal monthly repayments. Then let’s also assume that the money
lender experiences 10% bad debt rate (i.e. one of the ten borrowers
fails to repay the loan). That lender will lose $722.53 on these 10
loans cumulatively, and that is without any consideration given to
overhead, costs of processing and servicing the loan, marketing,
the money lender’s own internal financing costs, etc. Even with
only a 5% bad debt rate (i.e. one of the ten borrowers can only pay
back half of the principle and none of the interest) our
hypothetical money lender would lose $222.53 on these ten loans,
again without any consideration given for expenses or internal
financing costs. It turns out that if we assume the bad debt rate
may be as high as 10%, which certainly is not an unreasonable
assumption for this market, the amount of interest required for our
hypothetical money lender just to break even, assuming they have no
expenses or internal costs of financing is 89.2% “EIR”! That’s well
over quadruple what the new interest rate cap of 20% “EIR” is to
be!
The unfortunate nature of short-term, unsecured, subprime loans is
that they are necessarily at very high rates of interest so that
the borrowers that do repay their loans cover the losses associated
with the borrowers that do not with enough money left over for a
money lender to earn a reasonable profit. If this is not the case
there is no motivation to be in the money lending business at
all.
Clearly the industry can not profitably make short-term, unsecured
loans to subprime borrowers at an interest rate of only 20% “EIR”.
The IPTO’s new regulations effectively mean that short-term,
unsecured lending to borrowers with less than $30,000 in annual
income will become illegal as of June 1, 2012. That however, will
not mean that this industry will go away, it will simply be pushed
into the black market. As anyone that has studied economics knows,
price controls do not, cannot and will never work and this new
interest rate cap is effectively nothing more than a price control
on low-income subprime credit. The people who stand to benefit the
most from this incredibly bone-headed legislation are illegal black
market money lenders or loan sharks, the very entities the IPTO is
tasked with curtailing. Surely a greater gift could never be given
to black market money lenders than these new regulations.