Prayer Without Blind
Faith
Ken McLeod JUN 06, 2017
tricycle
There’s no need to pray to anything. If done
from a settled mind, what we are praying for arises
naturally.
We were gathered in the temple for a daylong
ritual during a three-year retreat in France. The person who was
leading the chants that month had a wry sense of humor. When we had
all sat down and were ready for him to begin, he paused. We waited.
In the silence that opened, he gently intoned, Mes frères, prions.
(“Let us pray, my brothers.”)
Straight out of a Catholic monastery! It was
an amusing and simple reminder that prayer was and is an essential
part of contemplative practice, regardless of tradition. Every
meditation we practiced involved prayers—prayers to the lineage,
prayers of refuge, prayers for bodhicitta [the wish to attain
enlightenment for the sake of all beings], prayers of devotion in
guru practice, prayers of praise in deity practice, prayers for
protection and activity in protector practice, dedication prayers,
good fortune prayers, offering prayers, and aspiration prayers.
Between meditation sessions, we were encouraged to read teaching
and aspiration prayers to fill the time and keep our minds from
wandering. We recited five or six long prayers at the end of the
evening ritual. And the daylong practices involved pages and pages
of prayers of many different types.
All these prayers were intended to shape our
attitudes and minds, as well as help us avoid distractions. I had
enough experience to know that conscious or deliberate attempts to
adopt specific attitudes often result in problematic contortions of
the mind. Other feelings are suppressed in favor of the desired
attitudes. Imbalances arise, and from there all kinds of problems
unfold, particularly in intensive practice settings. As a
consequence, I wasn’t sure how to approach all this
prayer.
A number of us had the same concerns. Early in
the three-year retreat, we asked our teacher, Kalu Rinpoche, what
we were meant to do with all these prayers and all this praying.
His answer was a bit surprising. “Let your mind settle naturally in
mahamudra and recite the prayers from there.” Mahamudra is all
about not-thinking, letting the mind settle so deeply that it does
not do anything. That was where we were meant to pray from? I
wasn’t sure what to make of that. What was the point of all these
prayers if you weren’t going to think about them?
Little by little, I came to appreciate the
wisdom and depth of Rinpoche’s instruction. In the Shangpa
tradition of Tibetan Buddhism, the basic instruction for mahamudra
is to let body, breath, and mind settle naturally. Though it sounds
simple, it is not easy. At first, you feel like you are doing
nothing, and it takes a while to appreciate that that is exactly
what you are doing (or not doing). The productive and
achievement-oriented parts of you start to rebel, and there is
nothing to do but let them settle naturally, too. Other stuff
arises, and you let those things quiet, too. After a while, you do
find that you are resting deeply, without effort, and your mind is
growing clearer and clearer.
As I practiced this approach to prayer during
the morning and evening rituals, the first thing I noticed was that
the prayers were gradually committed to memory without conscious
effort on my part. With daily recitation, without trying to think,
I found that the words were just there. I didn’t have to remember
them. A second effect was that the prayer took up residence in my
mind, again without conscious effort. While it was important to
study each prayer, once I had a good understanding of the content,
deliberately thinking about the prayer or trying to feel a certain
way seemed artificial and superfluous. Understanding came on its
own. So did devotion, gratitude, awe, and other powerful emotions.
It was sufficient to set an intention and then rest, letting the
words and meanings wash through me. The conceptual mind had little
influence here, and when it did arise, it usually felt like a
lead-footed dance partner in contrast to the nimble gazelle of the
non-conceptual mind.
I recently read a piece by my friend and
colleague Stephen Batchelor about his discomfort with prayer in the
Tibetan tradition. In particular, he raised the question, “To whom,
to what, are you praying?” This is a valid question, particularly
in the context of yidam, or deity practice, and even more so in the
context of protector practice [a different class of deities that
are invoked to create conditions conducive to practice]. On the one
hand, the deity is regarded as an expression of one’s own mind. On
the other, certainly in the rituals themselves, the deity is
regarded as something that has agency and power in its own right.
Are deities symbols? Are they independent figures? In general, the
ontological status of deity in Western thought has long been
fraught with difficulty—does God or a god really exist? Batchelor’s
exit from the conundrum was through Feuerbach, of whom Karl Marx
wrote, “[Feuerbach’s] work consists in the dissolution of the
religious world into its secular basis . . . Feuerbach resolves the
religious essence into the human.” Essentially, Feuerbach felt that
humans projected positive qualities onto a deity, and then prayed
to the deity (or God) for those positive qualities to be given to
them.
It makes sense, but this interpretation did
not tally with my own experience. After reading this piece, I
wondered why I had not experienced this conundrum, and I realized
that Kalu Rinpoche’s instruction played a significant role. When
you let the mind settle and let the conceptual mind subside, a
peace and openness arise naturally, regardless of what is going on
in your life (or in your mind). Questions about what is and what
isn’t fall away. The law of the excluded middle (a thing is either
this or that) simply doesn’t hold. The deity is just there. It is
your own mind. It is a symbol. It also has a kind of agency, at
least with respect to you. It is not you and it is you at the same
time. None of these perspectives are contradictory. They are all
valid. The conflicts arise only in the conceptual mind as it tries
to put these experiences into different and mutually exclusive
boxes.
In saying this, I’m not talking about blind
faith. Blind faith is a rigid adherence to certain beliefs for
which there is little or no evidence. These beliefs cannot be
questioned as they form an internal structure through which
experience is interpreted. Everything you experience is interpreted
in a way that conforms to the ideas already deeply implanted
inside. That is blind faith, or belief, a self-contained system
that maintains itself.
What I am trying to describe here is quite the
opposite. When you let the mind settle, you open to the totality of
what you are experiencing, including all the different ways you
interpret experience, whether they are consistent with each other
or not. In this field of sensory, emotional, and cognitive
experience, you naturally become aware of what is out of balance
and move in the direction of balance, weighing one interpretation
over another. But this direction is constantly changing. You end up
resting, but resting nowhere, constantly opening to the complexity
and richness of your experience. This opening is awake and
alive—not blind. It is a willingness to open to whatever arises in
experience and meet it.
Through that kind of faith, devotion, awe,
understanding, and compassion arise naturally. In effect, your
prayers are answered without your having to think about them. They
are answered through the practice of prayer itself.