Insight is not
enough
November 12,
2016 Bodhipaksa wildmind
These days there’s an
increasing interest in gaining insight. (Let’s just accept the
loaded word “gaining” for now.) On the whole this is a good thing.
For a long time many in the West have been doubtful about whether
awakening is a realistic goal. “Maybe we’re too messed up,” and
“Maybe the modern world isn’t conducive to awakening,” were common
doubts.
As the years have gone by, however, more and
more practitioners have had insight experiences, and this has been
very encouraging for others. More people now think not just that
awakening is possible, but that they personally are capable of it.
This is great! How can there be a downside to this?
One thing I’ve been concerned about recently is
the narrowness of the goal many people set themselves. The ultimate
aim of practice is often seen purely in terms of having insight
into non-self. And while that is crucial to attaining the goal,
simply having insights doesn’t turn you into the kind of person
that the Buddha suggested we should take as our ideal. The Buddha’s
concept of the ideal individual is someone who not only has
insight, but who is an all-round excellent human being.
In one conversation about the ideal person, the
Buddha outlines qualities such as: having calmness; being free from
craving; being free of attachment to preferences, being free from
fear, anger, and pride; being restrained in speech; having no
longings about the future and no regrets about the past; having
honesty and transparency; being free from envy; having no disdain
for others; refraining from insults; and not thinking in terns of
being superior, inferior, or even equal to others.
Elsewhere the Buddha talks of this ideal
individual very much in terms of gentleness, kindness, and
compassion. He encourages us to be the kind of person who doesn’t
act in ways that cause harm to others in any way, not even
indirectly, if that can at all be avoided. He also encouraged us to
be good friends to each other.
This is where we should conceive of our practice
leading. This is the goal we should orient our lives
around.
Inherent in the Buddha’s view of the goal is
that it’s not just about losing the delusion of self, or even of
gaining insight. It’s also about cultivating ethical, skillful
qualities—especially positive emotions. This is why the Buddhist
path is usually taught as starting with training in ethics, then in
meditation (including the active cultivation of kindness and
compassion), and only then, finally, culminating in the development
of insight.
For a small number of people, insight
experiences are upsetting or even devastating, leading to a loss of
meaning and a sense of despair. These cases are rare, and I don’t
personally know anyone for whom this has been more than a passing
disorientation before the positive aspects of insight have revealed
themselves. But in the cases I’ve heard of where some kind of
insight experience has lead to long-term problems, there seems to
have been a narrow focus on mindfulness and insight, and a lack of
emphasis on lovingkindness and compassion meditation. Many
meditation teachers have an habit of trying to ignore these
potential problems, but fortunately they are being studied and
hopefully we’ll learn more about them in time.
One of the benefits of modern neuroscience is
that we now know that as we learn a new skill, the brain physically
changes. Areas associated with that skill become larger, just as a
muscle grows with exercise. The goal of practice doesn’t just
involve a cognitive insight into impermanence or non-self, but
requires that we strengthen our “muscles” of kindness and
compassion. Developing insight removes certain barriers to the
arising of skillful qualities and (often) to the dropping away of
some of the grossly unskillful ones, but it takes effort to
actually bring about growth.
I’d encourage you, then, to develop, on the
cushion and in daily life, the qualities I’ve mentioned. If we do
that, then insight, when it arrives, is more likely to be an
astonishing, liberating, and joyful surprise, and less likely to be
a disorienting, upsetting, and painful shock to the
system.