The Grit That Becomes
a Pearl Dukkha,
explained
December
16, 2014 Thanissara
One of the essential messages of the Buddha is
that it's really important to get to know the experience of
dukkha, or dissatisfaction. Not to know it intellectually,
not to write a thesis about it, but to get to know it by meeting
this experience directly. Until we know dukkha, we don't really
have a way to end it. The discourse of the four truths that the
Buddha gave after his awakening begins not with enlightenment, but
with the encouragement to know dukkha, to know it in order to
overcome it.
To know the experience of suffering can sound
fairly straightforward. But the mind is pretty slippery around the
experience of dukkha. We tend to say, "The problem is it's too hot
or too cold, or it's the situation I'm in, or because I got so
screwed up when I was a kid, or it's my partner, or my job." Of
course external factors contribute to our happiness or suffering,
we don't need to dismiss the factors that shape our lives—but in
Vipassana we're not trying to figure out where the dukkha came
from. Instead we work with pain and suffering as we experience it,
without blaming others, repressing it, or projecting it inward onto
our self. Meeting dukkha in this direct way doesn't preclude
challenging or changing our individual or collective circumstance,
but it does empower us to stop unnecessary stuffering right at the
place we experience it, which is the mind.
When we experience dukkha, our first instinct
is to move our attention away and distract ourselves. We have
billion-dollar industries based on entertainment and consumption
keeping us distracted from this core truth of life. But are we more
content? Conversely, we can become addicted to pain, finding
ourselves repeatedly gravitating toward worry, old wounds, and
resentments. We can even wallow in suffering, our own and others'.
Some people become sufferers, great martyrs thinking "no one
suffers as much as me—let me just tell you about it." We all have
complex reactions to this everyday experience of
unsatisfactoriness. Often those reactions are personalized as "my
problem." It is very common for the mind to project suffering onto
the "self," interpreting dukkha as a personal failure: we are
failing because we suffer. Or the mind will project our suffering
onto those around us; it's somehow "their fault." In this activity
of projection and blame we miss how the mind itself generates an
endless stream of dukkha through its inability to accept self,
others, and life as it is. In short, it's our reactivity that
generates dukkha, keeping us agitated and therefore unable to
contemplate the actual, direct, here and now experience of
it.
The Buddha's way of explaining dukkha is a
great relief. He didn't say, "Well, it's your suffering, it's your
fault." Nor was his teaching, as it is sometimes articulated, "This
world's just a pile of suffering." That's pretty negative. Actually
he put it in a very dispassionate way. He just said, "There is
dukkha." Just as one might comment on a fact of nature, saying
"It's raining hard today" or "The trees are shedding their leaves."
Dukkha is inherent within the conditioned realm. Conditions mean
anything that emerges from formlessness and comes into form,
whether it's the body, feelings, perception, thought, or
sensations. Whatever form emerges, dukkha is inherent. Things are
dukkha because they are impermanent and therefore unreliable.
Actually, dukkha is natural and not suffering. It becomes suffering
when the mind identifies with phenomena and grasps. The meaning of
dukkha that conveys this process is
derived from the breakdown of the word into du, which
means "apart from" and kha—or akash—which means
"space." This gives the sense of being apart from the spacious, the
perfect, and the complete. In this way dukkha conveys the deepest anguish and dilemma of
the self, which is its state of separation from the
whole.
In meditation, when we bring attention to
"now," it allows whatever is present to be real to us. For example,
we notice the breath, the body, our feelings, and whatever impinges
upon our senses. Attention illuminates whatever is here, which is
often the experience of dukkha. Usually, even at a very subtle
level, there will be some sense of discontent, anxiety, or
restlessness. It's important to know dukkha, not to obsess about
it, but just to meet it. It's important because if we don't know
it, we continue to generate dukkha from false assumptions. We
actually make dukkha; the mind habitually and unconsciously
generates it.
Dukkha is different from pain. Buddhist
thought makes a distinction between pain and suffering. Pain is
part of our human experience. For example, getting sick is painful,
as is grief at the loss of a loved one; this is natural and
appropriate. However, we then tend to generate a whole extra layer
of suffering, through our difficulty in accepting how things are.
When we resist the natural flow of life we create suffering,
stress, and struggle. When we assume ownership and permanence in a
world that is constantly changing, we become burdened. In essence,
it is the ignorance of the mind, when it doesn't see the true
nature of reality, that produces suffering. And so, our
relationship to "how it is" becomes the conditioning factor for
either generating or reducing suffering.
We are doing the suffering; no one is doing it
to us. It is because of this that we can free ourselves from
unnecessary dukkha. This is not always easy to do. "How it is" can
really challenge us. Yet even though it is difficult, this is a
doable practice, otherwise the Buddha would not have taught it for
regular people like us.
For example, I suffered when the unethical
behavior of someone I trusted came to light. It had a devastating
impact. I felt betrayed. The theme of betrayal became a powerful
contemplation, particularly as there was no resolution. In the end
this situation taught me a lot. I kept reflecting on where the
suffering really was. Was it in the behavior of the other, in the
divisiveness that followed, in the blame that was projected? I
wanted more truth to come out, but it didn't, it stayed hidden in a
web of lies. When lies are covered up, it leaves those abused
without recourse to justice. This is a powerful theme that runs
through human history: people manipulating others for their own
ends, while at the same time distracting from their behavior by
shifting blame elsewhere. We'd be naive not to understand that the
conversion of lies to "truths" is pervasive in contemporary
political and corporate culture. When apprehended correctly, such
experiences become the sharpening for our wise realism.
To have a conscious relationship to suffering
is different than having an unconscious one. We will all experience
pain, simply due to our incarnation into form. It is part of being
human. We experience bodily pains, ill health, fatigue, hunger,
thirst, and as we get older we will feel the pains of aging. That's
just the way it is. Freedom from dukkha doesn't mean eternal youth,
or that we are never going to have a headache, never going to feel
irritation, or loss, or get betrayed and hurt by others. Freedom
from dukkha is not abdication from the human race, but a deeper
acceptance of how we are, an acceptance that brings both
equanimity, and also a clearer response.
Dukkha is also
categorized as the pain of things ending. Even within pleasant
experiences there is dukkha, because the nature of conditioned
things is to pass. All things already have their endings within
them. If we become attuned to this, then we can appreciate the
moment. We can appreciate the extraordinary fact of our unique and
precious lives. We can even appreciate dukkha, rather than
resisting it. We understand that the experience of suffering is a
portal to our awakening. We don't wish for suffering, but once we
understand how to be in relationship with it, it becomes the means
through which we mature as loving and wise people.
The Buddha placed the contemplation of dukkha
at the heart of his teaching. The foundation of Buddhist teaching
is formulated around his four noble truths: "There is dukkha,"
"Dukkha has a cause," "Dukkha has an end," and "The eightfold path
which brings about the ending of dukkha." Each of these truths has
a corresponding practice. In response to the first truth, the
practice is to "meet, understand, and contemplate" dukkha. The
practice for the second truth is to "let go or abandon" the causes
of dukkha. The third is to "realize or recognize" the end of
dukkha, and the fourth is to "develop or cultivate" the path
leading out of dukkha. Sometimes this teaching is misrepresented as
a negative view on life, such as "Buddhists are just into
suffering." Actually, it's a very positive message, as it says we
can do something about the dukkha we unconsciously generate and
then experience. This simple teaching is actually extremely
profound and direct. It offers a clear diagnosis of the fact of
suffering, an insight into the causes of suffering, and a remedy
and cure for suffering.
The four noble truths may not be a very
fashionable teaching, but it's an extremely profound one. Wherever
we are, when dukkha arises, we have a pathway to peace. In calming
meditation, we develop strength of mind through the practice of
steadying attention on the breath, body, or our chosen object of
contemplation. In insight meditation, we take that same strength of
attentiveness and bring it directly to the experience of dukkha, as
it is felt within the body and heart. We do this in a very
particular way, by neither justifying nor trying to fix the pain,
neither being overwhelmed nor shaped by it, nor repressing or
distancing ourselves. The art of meditation is to meet dukkha
directly, to breath with it, and inquire into it. This is
ultimately less painful than avoiding it.
I remember as a young nun I suffered a lot. I
trained in a male monastic hierarchy deeply ambivalent to the
presence of nuns. Initially, I didn't see the impact, but as time
went on, I noticed it generated a painful and divisive power
dynamic. I was grateful to live as a monastic, but the fine line
between "training" and the blunt use of power was
unhealthy—particularly when as nuns, we had no agency in the
decisions that shaped our lives.
However, there wasn't much I could do about
the situation. Basically, it was just a lot of suffering. One day,
I was contemplating the pain in my heart due to some new rules that
had been handed down without consultation, which I found churlish.
I was just right there, holding attention to the sensation. It felt
like a knife in my chest and a hand around my throat. It was very
visceral, and although the trigger was a controlling hierarchy, the
feeling felt ancient. It was the familiar pain of powerlessness. In
the middle of my walking meditation, I stopped and stretched out my
arms like Christ on the cross, and screamed out, "I accept this
suffering!" It sounds dramatic (and somewhat inflated), and
fortunately I was well hidden in the monastery forest! But
something profound happened. I realized I could be with a painful
dynamic and not suffer. My suffering was there because I didn't
want things the way they were. In my acceptance, the suffering
turned to compassion. I felt compassion for the monks and nuns, for
myself, for everything and everyone. Meeting experience as it
is empowers. We may not always be able to change a challenging
situation, but we can be better resourced to engage with
it.
Ajahn Chah came from a farming community in
Northeast Thailand and left school at thirteen. He tended to put
things in unacademic, immediate, and straightforward ways. He often
pointed to the fact that dukkha arises because the mind is caught
up in "wanting and not wanting." We want what is not here and don't
want what is here. This is very simply put and yet challenging to
really see. However, framing it like this, Ajahn Chah points to a
direct practice. With some steadiness of mind, we can reflect on
desire, and its internal narrative of always wanting things to be
different from what they are. We frame our experience: "I don't
want it to be like this; I want it to be different." Each moment we
want, long, wait, and look for something that is not there, we
generate dukkha. Conversely, when there is resistance or aversion
to how it is, we generate dukkha. We resist what is "now." The push
and pull of the mind undermines our capacity for contentment. When
we look into the second truth of desire and aversion, we get
perspective. What we struggle with can be okay. It is workable. We
can work with all of it, people blaming us, pains in the body,
emotional turmoil—instead of continually adding dukkha through our
judgment, "It shouldn't be like this."
A lot of the time we feel, "It shouldn't be
like this!" It should be somehow different. We should be in a
heaven-like world. But we weren't born into heaven; we were born in
this world, with its wars, environmental degradation, suffering,
exploitation, difficulty, and pain. Accepting the reality of dukkha
isn't an abdication from response, it is a way to understand that
the most effective way we can change the world is through the
quality of our own awareness. As we work to resolve our personal
dukkha, we lessen the possibility that our actions will increase
the suffering that already exists.
When Kittisaro was a novice monk, just before
his full ordination, his parents took a trip to Thailand, all the
way from Chattanooga, Tennessee, to find out what he was doing. In
the process they met Ajahn Chah. Kittisaro's father is a very
astute political observer and at that time he was concerned, as
were most Americans, with the war in Vietnam and the threat of
communism. He was concerned that the monastery, which was on the
border of Laos, would be invaded by communist guerillas. Ajahn Chah
said that the thing he should really worry about was the "communist
guerrillas in the mind." I guess nowadays he would have pointed us
back to the "terrorists of the mind."
This is where we begin and end. We take
everything back to the mind. As we experience life, all sorts of
feelings, thoughts, and reactions arise. Our problem isn't so much
"what is" but our relationship to what is. When I consider my own
suffering, so much of it comes from the fact that I simply cannot
accept life, and people as they are. I get upset by what people do.
Ajahn Chah said it's like hollering at a person who upsets you.
Then someone comes up and says, "You know, that person is crazy."
You relax, because suddenly there's perspective. Until we are
mature human beings, we're all a little crazy; we all produce
suffering. So it means we are going to learn patience! The ongoing
inquiry into the nature of suffering is a patient process. These
four truths are a deepening hologram: wherever we touch them we
enter the process of contemplation. When we locate clinging,
desire, and aversion, then, as encouraged by the Buddha, we let
go.
Letting go is the third noble truth.
Vipassana insight meditation reveals where we hold on. Where we
hold on, right there is dukkha. Right where there's dukkha is the
place of letting go. In insight meditation we contemplate the
nature of suffering and its release. Actually, the mind in its
natural state is open, aware, and present. It is reflective. But
the mind, when tinged by ignorance, has a tendency to constrict
around thought-forms and desire, generating a sense of self that
feels "It's not enough" or "I'm not enough." Our lack of inner
freedom is often born from this feeling of "not enough." The
constriction around "I need to be something more" or "I don't want
what is here" is a constant irritation. Ajahn Chah likened it to a
dog with mange. He goes into the shade, to the heat, from place to
place, running around everywhere trying to find relief, scratching
here, scratching there. The dog keeps feeling each place is the
problem, not realizing his discomfort is due to his own
skin.
In a moment of just stopping and
relinquishing our addiction to "wanting and not wanting," a whole
other dimension opens up. When the cause of dukkha is released, we
recognize a timeless abiding, always here now, which is the
heart/mind's natural state. Recognizing the mind in its natural
state is not something to attain; it's a realization. When grasping
and resistance cease, the endless chasing of one thing after
another, then the mind recognizes the taste of its own nature,
which is the taste of peace. This peace is nibbana.
Just as the grit in an oyster becomes a
pearl, so dukkha has its function. Awakening quickens through wise
contemplation of suffering. Instead of blindly reacting to the
experience of dukkha, shifting around it or blaming someone else
for it, we apprehend it directly, and more quickly. A conditioning
factor for this process is what the Buddha called nibbida,
which means "disenchantment." We finally come to a place in
ourselves when we know another experience isn't going to alleviate
our basic sense of discontent—the next holiday, the next
acquisition, or the next exciting distraction. In our contemporary
society, when we feel disenchanted it is seen as a
problem. We are encouraged to go shopping, take medication, or find
some other escape. We think, "If I sit on the beach today I'll be
much happier than staying here." So we go to the beach. We're happy
for a few minutes and then think, "If I just had a nice coffee, I'd
feel better." Or we think, "It's too hot here. If I go up into the
mountains where it's cooler, I'd be happy." This seeking drives us
on and on. It's a good sign when we begin to be suspicious of
endless pursuit; it means we're not buying into it so much. Periods
of retreat bring us into direct confrontation with what we've been
trying desperately to avoid—this basic feeling of dissatisfaction.
This isn't to say that things like anti-depressants and holidays
don't have their place. But even when we get life as perfect as we
can, the underlying message of dukkha still crashes in. It prods us
until we respond to the invitation to contemplate our experience
more carefully. Sometimes when we acknowledge the presence of
suffering, we immediately want a solution. Fix it quick! Get a
Band-Aid! Take it away!
This is kind and careful work. When
circumstances generate pain or anguish, we can lessen dukkha by
patiently containing our reactivity. Then, at the place of
suffering, the journey of transformation opens up. As beauitfully
articulated in Mark Nepo's poem, we become "a soft and sturdy home
in which real things can land." This describes perfectly the
quality of awareness and receptivity needed to undertake the
journey through suffering. We "no longer try to make sense of the
pain." We create a space and allow awareness to provide a gentle
holding for the "irritations that rub to a pearl." This is the work
of Vipassana. As we inquire into the moment, dukkha becomes dharma,
or nature, rather than "me" that is wrong or bad. As we listen more
deeply to suffering, we begin to notice non-suffering. The heart
realizes its innate courage, strength, and invincibility. This
journey through pain and suffering burns away the impurities, and
what is revealed is something pristine, clear, and beautiful, like
a moonlit pearl: the tender, merciful heart, and its infinite
ability to receive the cries of the world.
When we're with suffering, it's as if we are with a child that's
very unhappy. If the child is wailing and wriggling, wanting to get
away, wanting something but it doesn't know what, we kindly hold
the child. Sometimes we can experience our minds as the child and
the awareness as the mother. The child of the mind can be really
hurting and screaming, "I can't bear this. I'm hopeless!" Or, "No
one is there for me," or just an unnameable pain that seems so
familiar, so ancient, and so intractable. But the mother, our
aware, present heart, just sits it out and waits patiently for the
deeper truth to emerge. She is breathing with the pain while gently
holding the mind and body with kind awareness. Then something
happens; something beyond the re-activity of the mind. Instead the
heart softens. It sees its own nature: spacious, non-suffering,
peaceful, and timeless. Here is freedom. Here we find the courage
to bear suffering in order to overcome it.
All the world is full of suffering. It is also full of
overcoming. —Helen Keller