Buddha's
bowl wanted back
Hindustan
Times HT Correspondent 2013-08-31
August 27 -- Former union minister and RJD
leader Raghuvansh Prasad Singh has launched a campaign to retrieve
Gautama Buddha's Bhiksha Patra (begging bowl) that was taken away
to Afghanistan two thousand years ago.
The people of Vaishali (Singh's
constituency) are the right claimants of this national treasure, as
Buddha had donated it to the people of the region when he was
leaving for his mahanirvan (abandoning his mortal body) around 500
BC, after delivering his last speech. For the next 500 years, a
regular 'puja' of the begging bowl had been done at
Vaishali.
Emperor Kanishka, who invaded India in the
1st century AD, took away the patra to Purushpur (present day
Peshawar). During the term of former Afghanistan President Mohammed
Najibullah (1987-1992), it was moved to the Kabul
museum.
Singh, whose campaign is being supported by
60 international Buddhist 'maths' (schools), has furnished
historical material supporting his case to the Archeological Survey
of India and the Ministry of External Affairs.
Former foreign affairs minister SM Krishna
had assured me that the Indian government would take steps to
retrieve the treasure. I have now sent a reminder to the present
minister, Salman Khurshid, Singh said. Singh is also planning to
write a letter to Bihar CM Nitish Kumar, seeking his cooperation in
the matter.
Chinese travelers
including Fa Hein and Huang Tsang have referred to the presence of
Buddha's begging bowl in Afghanistan, as has Alexander Cunningham
(first Director General of the Archeological Survey of India).
Historians including Dr. Shreedhar Vasudev Sohani and Romila Thapar
have also supported the theory that the 'patra' had been taken away
by Emperor Kanishka, Singh said on Monday.
Let Buddha bowl be,
say historians
The Telegraph NALIN VERMA
2013-08-29
August 28 --
Patna: Historians have questioned the demand to bring back a bowl
said to have been used by Gautama Buddha from its present resting
place in Afghanistan to Bihar.
Romila
Thapar, professor emerita at Jawaharlal Nehru University, today
distanced herself from the claim of RJD MP Raghuvansh Prasad Singh
that she supported the demand to get back the bowl, or
bhikshapatra, to India. Raghuvansh, speaking in the Lok Sabha on
Monday, had said a movement should be launched to bring the bowl
from the National Museum in Kabul to Vaishali, where, according to
legend, Buddha is said to have donated the vessel to his disciples
when on his way to attaining nirvana (salvation) at
Kushinagar.
"I am not
behind such a demand. It is for the first time that I am hearing
from you that there is a demand doing the rounds about shifting of
Buddha’s bowl from the museum in Kabul to Vaishali,” Thapar told
The Telegraph.
Asked about
the historicity of the bowl, Thapar said she had no idea. “I don’t
know. I can’t say anything on it,” she said. Raghuvansh, the MP
from Vaishali, however, stuck to his guns. “Archaeologist Alexander
Cunningham wrote that Lord Buddha’s bhikshapatra that he had gifted
to his disciples at Vaishali has been lying in the Kabul museum.
The bhikshapatra found mention in the accounts of Fa Hien and Hiuen
Tsang as well. My demand, which has taken the shape of a movement,
has the backing of Romila Thapar besides several other historians,
including I.N. Singh of Delhi University and Siddhartha Singh of
Benaras Hindu University,” Raghuvansh told The Telegraph on
Thursday.
Historian
and social commentator Ramachandra Guha came out with a different
perspective on the issue. “It is not the question of tracing the
veracity of Buddha’s begging bowl. Be it in Kabul or wherever the
vessel is, it carries the great Buddha’s message of universal
peace. It is quite parochial to ask for the bowl to be restored
back in Vaishali,” he told The Telegraph by phone.
"That the
people of Afghanistan have preserved Buddha’s artefact for
thousands of years establishes quite clearly that the great
preacher, who was born in Nepal and attained enlightenment in
Bihar, had a special place in their hearts. The people of that part
of the land (Afghanistan) owned Buddha then,” Guha said.
He pointed
out that the Taliban vandalised the giant statues of Buddha in the
Bamiyan valley in 2001. “That his vessel is still preserved in the
National Museum of Kabul is testimony to the fact that the people
there respected his message of peace. Instead of asking for the
bowl, the people of Bihar should take pride in the fact that
Buddha’s message had spread beyond the boundary of Bihar, Nepal and
India and is valued in several other parts of the globe even after
2,500 years of his passing away,” Guha said.
Cunningham,
in his archaeological survey’s report published in the late 19th
century, wrote that Kushan king Kanishka — himself a great patron
of Buddhism — had taken Buddha’s bowl from Vaishali to Purushpur
(Peshawar) which was shifted to Gandhar (present day Kandahar). The
bowl was finally taken to the National Museum of Kabul in the 20th
century.
Former head
of the department of history, Delhi University, D.N. Jha, who
happens to be from Bihar, was sceptical of Raghuvansh’s demand as
it is based on Cunningham’s report. “Much water has flown down the
Indus and Ganga since Cunningham wrote the report in the late 19th
century. There is little archaeological and historical evidence to
verify what Cunningham wrote,” he said.
Jha echoed
historian Guha, saying Buddha’s message spread beyond the boundary
of India and reached out to many countries in Southeast and East
Asia. “Buddha belonged as much to Vaishali in India as much to the
people of China, Japan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Bhutan and several
other countries. His message of peace was for the entire humanity,”
he said.
Officials at
the Patna museum said they were not too keen on getting the bowl
back. “We have old sculptures of George VI and Viceroy Hardinge,
old paintings of Lieutenant Governor Bailey (the first governor of
Bihar following separation from Bengal) and Sir Henry Wheeler. They
are part of our history and we will feel very sad if the British
government demands these artefacts from the museum,” a museum
employee said on condition of anonymity.
Raghuvansh,
though, is adamant he will carry on with his movement and convince
the external affairs ministry to take up his demand.
"The people
of Vaishali want Buddha’s bhikshapatra back and I will keep on
leading the movement for it. S.M. Krishna as external affairs
minister had promised me he would get the artefact back. Besides
Indian historians, historians from Pakistan and Afghanistan too
have backed our demand,” he said.