Jnana:
Here's a paper for anyone who may be interested in trying to
navigate through this particular labyrinth of doctrinal
development:
A Comparison of Ālaya-Vijñāna in Yogācāra and Dzogchen by David
F. Germano and William S. Waldron.
How are we shaped by structures and processes outside our conscious
awareness? To what degree are these processes bodily, emotional, or
cognitive? How do they determine the way we react to or apprehend
our world? Are they peculiar to each individual or also
intersubjective? Are these structures largely fixed, or are they
ongoing constructive processes? How can we bring these structures
and processes into conscious awareness? How can reflexive awareness
alter their character and influence? Are these processes pure or
impure? If they were originally pure, how would deluded and
distorted reactive patterns arise? Or if these processes were
originally impure, how could they be purified? And if they were
originally pure, how would such purity appear within deluded
bodily, emotional, and cognitive experiences?
These questions have been raised by countless thinkers over the
centuries and systematically addressed by mystics and philosophers
alike. We will examine Buddhist responses to these questions in the
Indian Yogācāra and Tibetan Great Perfection (rdzogs chen)
traditions as articulated through the concepts of “foundational
consciousness” (S: ālaya-vijñāna, T: kun gzhi rnam par shes pa) and
“foundation/ground” (S: ālaya, T: kun gzhi), respectively.
Thanks for the link. But found
the author’s description on the section by Longchengpa rather
complicated. Any simplified version or link on the
Tibetan Great
Perfection?