If there are
neither two nor one, there is already no present of any subtle
awareness that can be taken as a ‘I’?
Think of it this way: if river is already empty of any entity
called river, being a mere label collating the activity of flowing,
would it make sense to say 'the independent and permanent river is
inseparable with the impermanent flowing' or 'the independent and
permanent weather is inseperable with rain and wind'? It would not,
as no independent and permanent river and weather apart from those
phenomena can be found.
Therefore there is no one or two, because there is no
river-entity to begin with that could be one or two with the
flowing.
The same is with mind and phenomena, awareness and
phenomena.
In actual case, in the seeing there is just the seen without
seer, the seen is itself the seeing, the seen is itself its
knowing.