While the request for people to petition to make unethical
conversion a punishable offence have some merits, more should be
articulated about mental anquish, the right to one's own personal
beliefs without coercions or undue pressure, and whether how it is
enshrined in our constition.
Whether it is morally acceptable to impose own personal beliefs
on others, and also those close to us, like our parents or our
children. With children, especially those of your own, you impose
your values without question, as part of their inheritance, maybe
until they are of the questioning age.
Also, this evangelising is specially targetted at a one or a few
of the denominations, especially at their inability to empathize
and respect the individua'sl or their familie's right to belief and
personal space. It all seems too much like a memberhip drive to an
exclusive club.
Most people identify themselves with a religion, but that does
not make them an expert on their religion. It is just a makeup of
beliefs with they inherit and evolve. Many attach to that without
fully examining or understanding this makeup of beliefs and
ideas, it just is.
So when confronted with protelyzing elements, they are unable to
articulate their position, making them confused and angry. This
phenomena at protelyzing is not new, it's been around longer than
I've been around. And it been increasing segregating the populace,
and reaction to it has been getting more vocal.
Usually this means that this issue have never been fully
addressed,seen to be glossed or swept under, at most, to some, a
slap on the wrist,therefore, noises are getting louder.
However, guiding principles must acknowledged and accepted
as on how and when to share beliefs. What that is deemed
acceptable and what that deemed is not.
